This site is supported by donations to The OEIS Foundation.

8

From OeisWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


This article is under construction.            

Please do not rely on any information it contains.            


8 is the cube of 2, the largest cube in the sequence of Fibonacci numbers.

Membership in core sequences

Even numbers 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, ... A005843
Composite numbers 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, ... A002808
Cubes 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216, 343, 512, 729, 1000, ... A000578
Powers of 2 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, ... A000079
Primes and powers of primes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 23, ... A000961
Fibonacci numbers 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, ... A000045

In Pascal's triangle, 8 occurs only twice, namely in row 8, in the second and next to last positions.

Sequences pertaining to 8

Multiples of 8 0, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, ... A008590
Octagonal numbers 1, 8, 21, 40, 65, 96, 133, 176, 225, 280, 341, ... A000567
Centered octagonal numbers 1, 9, 25, 49, 81, 121, 169, 225, 289, 361, 441, ... A016754
Octagonal pyramidal numbers 1, 9, 30, 70, 135, 231, 364, 540, 765, 1045, ... A002414

Partitions of 8

There are twenty-two partitions of 8. The partitions of 8 into primes are 2 + 3 + 3 and 3 + 5.

Roots and powers of 8

In the table below, irrational numbers are given truncated to eight decimal places.

8 2.82842712 A010466 8 2 64
83 2.00000000 A000038 8 3 512
84 1.68179283 A011006 8 4 4096
85 1.51571656 A011093 8 5 32768
86 1.41421356 A002193 8 6 262144
87 1.34590019 A011246 8 7 2097152
88 1.29683955 A011247 8 8 16777216
89 1.25992104 A002580 8 9 134217728
810 1.23114441 A011249 8 10 1073741824
A001018

Of course the roots given above are the principal real roots. There are also negative real roots and complex roots.

  • 8, 8 (both real)
  • 83, 1±3 (the two complex roots are the same except for the sign of the imaginary part)
  • 84, 84, i84, i84
  • 85, etc.

Logarithms and eighth powers

In the OEIS specifically and mathematics in general, logx refers to the natural logarithm of x, whereas all other bases are specified with a subscript. Octal logarithms are only occasionally considered.

As above, irrational numbers in the following table are truncated to eight decimal places.

log82 0.33333333 A010701 log28 3.00000000 2 8 256
log8e 0.48089834 log8 2.07944154 A016631 e8 2980.95798704
log83 0.52832083 A152956 log38 1.89278926 A113210 3 8 6561
log8π 0.55049870 logπ8 1.81653468 π8 9488.53101607
log84 0.66666666 log48 1.50000000 4 8 65536
log85 0.77397603 A153204 log58 1.29202967 A153739 5 8 390625
log86 0.86165416 A153493 log68 1.16055842 A153754 6 8 1679616
log87 0.93578497 A153618 log78 1.06862156 A153755 7 8 5764801
log88 1.00000000 8 8 16777216
log89 1.05664166 A154010 log98 0.94639463 A153756 9 8 43046721
log810 1.10730936 A154159 log108 0.90308998 A153790 10 8 100000000

(See A001016 for the eighth powers of integers).

Values for number theoretic functions with 8 as an argument

μ(8) 0
M(8) –2
π(8) 4
σ1(8) 15
σ0(8) 4
ϕ(8) 4
Ω(8) 3
ω(8) 1
λ(8) -1 This is the Carmichael lambda function.
λ(8) –1 This is the Liouville lambda function.
ζ(8)=π89450 1.0040773561979443393786852385... (see A013666).
8! 40320
Γ(8) 5040

Factorization of 8 in some quadratic integer rings

In , 8 has the prime factorization of 2 3. But it has different factorizations in some quadratic integer rings.

[i] (1i)3(1+i)3
[2] (1)(2)6 [2] (2)6
[ω] 2 3 [3] (1)(13)3(1+3)3
[5] [ϕ] 2 3
[6] [6] (1)(26)3(2+6)3
𝒪(7) (1272)3(12+72)3 [7] (37)3(3+7)3
[10] 2 3 [10] 2 3
𝒪(11) [11] (1)(311)3(3+11)3
[13] 𝒪(13) 2 3
[14] [14] (414)3(4+14)3
𝒪(15) [15] 2 3
[17] 𝒪(17) (1)(32172)3(32+172)3
𝒪(19) [19] (1)(13319)3(13+319)3

The astute reader might wonder if (1+3)3 counts as a factorization apart from 2 3 in [3]. But that is not a complete ring of algebraic integers, as 𝒪(3)=[ω], where ω=12+32. So, as it turns out, 1+3=2ω, thus 8=(2ω)3=23ω3. But ω is a unit, and therefore 8=(1+3)3 is no more a distinct factorization than, say, 8=(1)223, in which –1 is a unit and therefore does not turn 2 3 into anything substantially different.

The relationship of −8, 8 to quadratic integer rings adjoining the square roots of −2, 2

There really isn't such a thing as [8] or [8]. Any factorization that we can come up with in those "rings" essentially boils down to a factorization in [2] or [2].

For example, 9=(18)(1+8). Note that (12)(1+2)=3, and that (12)2=122; likewise (1+2)2=1+22. Also note that (22)2=8.

Our example for [8] will be much more direct. This time, in 7=(1)(18)(1+8), we immediately substitute 22 for 8, giving us 7=(1)(122)(1+22).

Essentially "[8]" consists of those algebraic integers of the form n+2m2. Since 2m must be even, we are ignoring algebraic integers for which 2 is multiplied by an odd integer, and so "[8]" is a "sub-domain" of [2]. Likewise for "[8]" and [2].

Representation of 8 in various bases

Base 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 through 36
Representation 1000 22 20 13 12 11 10 8

In the balanced ternary numeral system, 8 is {1, 0, –1}, meaning 3230. In negabinary, 8 is 11000, since (2)4+(2)3=168=8. In quater-imaginary base, 8 is 10200. In the factorial numeral system, 8 is 110, since 3!+2!=8. And in 2-base, 8 is 1000000.

The octal numeral system, which is occasionally used by computer programmers, can be thought of as a shorthand for binary, whereby three binary digits correspond to one octal digit:

000 0
001 1
010 2
011 3
100 4
101 5
110 6
111 7

Thus, the powers of 2 in octal are then 1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 40, 100, ... (A004647), and the Mersenne numbers are 1, 3, 7, 17, 37, 77, ...

See also

Some integers
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
1729