This site is supported by donations to The OEIS Foundation.

19

From OeisWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


This article is under construction.            

Please do not rely on any information it contains.            


19 is a prime number. Any positive integer can be expressed as a sum of 19 or fewer fourth powers.

Membership in core sequences

Odd numbers ..., 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, ... A005408
Prime numbers ..., 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, ... A000040
Squarefree numbers ..., 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 23, ... A005117
Mersenne exponents 2, 3, 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 31, 61, ... A000043
Central trinomial coefficients 1, 1, 3, 7, 19, 51, 141, 393, ... A002426

In Pascal's triangle, 19 occurs twice. (In Lozanić's triangle, 19 occurs four times).

Sequences pertaining to 19

Multiples of 19 0, 19, 38, 57, 76, 95, 114, 133, 152, 171, 190, 209, 228, ... A008601
19-gonal numbers 1, 19, 54, 106, 175, 261, 364, 484, 621, 775, 946, 1134, ... A051871
3x+1 sequence starting at 33 33, 100, 50, 25, 76, 38, 19, 58, 29, 88, 44, 22, 11, 34, 17, ... A008880
3x1 sequence starting at 36 36, 18, 9, 26, 13, 38, 19, 56, 28, 14, 7, 20, 10, 5, 14, 7, 20, ... A008894
19-rough numbers 1, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, ... A166061

Partitions of 19

There are 490 partitions of 19.

The Goldbach representations of 19 are 2 + 17 = 3 + 5 + 11 = 19 (there's also 3 + 3 + 13 = 5 + 7 + 7 if it's not required that the primes be distinct).

Roots and powers of 19

In the table below, irrational numbers are given truncated to eight decimal places.

19 4.35889894 A010475 19 2 361
193 2.66840164 A010591 19 3 6859
194 2.08779762 A011015 19 4 130321
195 1.80198312 A011104 19 5 2476099
196 1.63352430 A011410 19 6 47045881
197 1.52292699 A011411 19 7 893871739
198 1.44492132 A011412 19 8 16983563041
199 1.38702322 A011413 19 9 322687697779
1910 1.34237965 A011414 19 10 6131066257801
A001029

Logarithms and nineteenth powers

In the OEIS specifically and mathematics in general, logx refers to the natural logarithm of x, whereas all other bases are specified with a subscript.

As above, irrational numbers in the following table are truncated to eight decimal places.

TABLE GOES HERE

Values for number theoretic functions with 19 as an argument

μ(19) –1
M(19) –3
π(19) 8
σ1(19) 20
σ0(19) 2
ϕ(19) 18
Ω(19) 1
ω(19) 1
λ(19) 18 This is the Carmichael lambda function.
λ(19) –1 This is the Liouville lambda function.
ζ(19) 1.0000019... See A013677.
19! 121645100408832000
Γ(19) 6402373705728000

Factorization of some small integers in a quadratic integer ring adjoining the square roots of −19, 19

Both 𝒪(19) and [19] are unique factorization domains. There is something quite interesting about the way in which 𝒪(19) is a UFD. But first, we'll look at [19]. In that domain, the norm function is N(a+b19)=a219b2.

Theorem Z19EUC. The domain [19] is a Euclidean domain in which the absolute value of the norm is a suitable Euclidean function. Given any two nonzero numbers m,n[19], it is always possible to find two other numbers q,r[19] such that n=qm+r, q0 and 0|N(r)|<|N(m)|.

If this is true, then the Euclidean GCD algorithm can be implemented in this domain. Whatever two nonzero numbers in the domain are input into the algorithm, a sequence of quotients and remainders is produced, and the absolute values of the norms of the remainders form a decreasing sequence. The Euclidean algorithm may or may not always produce optimal results, but it should always produce an answer in a finite number of steps.

Proof. If m is a divisor of n, or the other way around, then q=nm or mn as needed, and r=0. If this is not the case, it does not automatically mean m and n are coprime, but it does mean that nm∉[19] but nm(19). Notate n=a+b19 and m=c+d19. The we have:
a+b19c+d19=(a+b19)(c+d19)c219d2=s+t19
where s,t(19). Now choose u,v such that |su|,|tv|12 and then set q=u+v19 and r=nqm. Since the norm is multiplicative, it follows that N(r)=N(m)N((su)+(tv)19) and therefore
???34N(m)<N(r)<34N(m)????
as specified by the theorem. ENDOFPROOFMARK

We then say that [19] is norm-Euclidean, and from this it automatically follows that it is a principal ideal domain and therefore a unique factorization domain. 𝒪(19), on the other hand, is a principal ideal domain but not norm-Euclidean, and a single example example suffices to demonstrate that it is not norm-Euclidean.

Given m=32+192 and n=10, can we find numbers q,r𝒪(19) such that n=qm+r, q0 and 0N(r)<N(m)? In this domain, the norm is never negative, and since the numbers are spread out throughout the complex plane rather than crammed on the real number line, it is easy to make diagrams to help us visualize these things. In the following diagram, 0 is represented by a black dot, the nonzero numbers of 32+192 by green dots, and the nonzero numbers of 10 by red dots.

As you can see, 10 is a red dot that almost smack dab in the middle of a lozenge-like shape formed by green dots. It stands to reason that, as values of qm, those green dots closest to 10 correspond to smaller r than green dots farther away. We need to find just one dot such that N(r)<7.

qm r N(r)
7 3 9
172+192 32+192 7
10+19 19 19
11+19 119 20
252+192 52192 11
14 –4 16

It's not necessary to continue this with 252192 and so on to see that there is no value of r suitable for the Euclidean algorithm to be found.

We do need a theorem to prove that 𝒪(19) is not Euclidean for any suitable function whatsoever, and it becomes a little more involved to show that it is a principal ideal domain. But we will not include those theorems here at this time.

Of course the Euclidean algorithm is not the only way to find GCDs. From prime factorizaton alone it would be obvious that gcd(32+192,10)=1. Now follows a table of factorization of some small integers in 𝒪(19) and [19].

n 𝒪(19) [19]
2 Prime (1)(13319)(13+319)
3 (1)(419)(4+19)
4 2 2 (13319)2(13+319)2
5 (12192)(12+192) (9219)(9+219)
6 2 × 3 (13319)(13+319)(419)(4+19)
7 (32192)(32+192) Prime
8 2 3 (1)(13319)3(13+319)3
9 3 2 (419)2(4+19)2
10 2(12192)(12+192) (1)(13319)(13+319)(9219)(9+219)
11 (52192)(52+192) Prime
12 2 2 × 3 (1)(13319)2(13+319)2(419)(4+19)
13 Prime
14 2(32192)(32+192) (1)(13319)(13+319)7
15 3(12192)(12+192) (1)(419)(4+19)(9219)(9+219)
16 2 4 (13319)4(13+319)4
17 (72192)(72+192) (619)(6+19)
18 2 × 3 2 (1)(13319)(13+319)(419)2(4+19)2
19 (1)(19)2 (19)2
20 22(12192)(12+192) (13319)2(13+319)2(9219)(9+219)

Since both of these domains are UFDs, looking at the factorizations of ideals does not give us much insight. The factorization of an ideal is pretty much the same as that of the generating number. Often it's just a matter of changing parentheses to angle brackets.

However, there are a few subtleties to consider, which concern 2 and 19 (and, of course, also their negative counterparts).

First, although 2=(1)(13319)(13+319) (as noted above), the ideal 2 in [19] ramifies, since 13319 and 13+319 are associated by multiplication by a unit. And so, 2=13+3192.

In 𝒪(19), 2 is prime, as is the ideal generated by it. The equation x2+76y2=2z has no solutions in nonzero integers. This means that if a number in this domain has nonzero imaginary part and an even norm, then that norm is divisible by an odd number greater than 1. For example, 1+19 and 3+19 have norms that are divisible by 5 and by 7, respectively.

Lastly, note that although (19)2=19, as ideals go, we still have 19=192.

Factorization of 19 in some quadratic integer rings

As was mentioned above, 19 is a prime number in . But it is composite in some quadratic integer rings.

TABLE GOES HERE

Representation of 19 in various bases

Base 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 through 36
Representation 10011 201 103 34 31 25 23 21 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 J

See also

Some integers
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
1729