login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A188553
T(n,k) = Number of n X k binary arrays without the pattern 0 1 diagonally, vertically, antidiagonally or horizontally.
8
2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 4, 5, 8, 7, 5, 6, 12, 12, 9, 6, 7, 17, 20, 16, 11, 7, 8, 23, 32, 28, 20, 13, 8, 9, 30, 49, 48, 36, 24, 15, 9, 10, 38, 72, 80, 64, 44, 28, 17, 10, 11, 47, 102, 129, 112, 80, 52, 32, 19, 11, 12, 57, 140, 201, 192, 144, 96, 60, 36, 21, 12, 13, 68, 187, 303, 321, 256, 176
OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
From Miquel A. Fiol, Feb 06 2024: (Start)
Also, T(n,k) is the number of words of length k, x(1)x(2)...x(k), on the alphabet {0,1,...,n}, such that, for i=2,...,k, x(i)=either x(i-1) or x(i)=x(i-1)-1.
For the bijection between arrays and sequences, notice that the i-th column consists of 1's and then 0's, and there are x(i)=0 to n of 1's.
Such a bijection implies that all the empirical/conjectured formulas in A188554, A188555, A188556, A188557, A188558, and A188559 become correct.
(End)
LINKS
FORMULA
Empirical: T(n,k) = (n+1)*2^(k-1) + (1-k)*2^(k-2) for k < n+3, and then the entire row n is a polynomial of degree n in k.
From Miquel A. Fiol, Feb 06 2024: (Start)
The above empirical formula is correct.
It can be proved that T(n,k) satisfies the recurrence
T(n,k) = Sum_{r=1..n+1} (-1)^(r+1)*binomial(n+1,r)*T(n,k-r)
with initial values
T(n,k) = Sum_{r=0..k-1} (n+1-r)*binomial(k-1,r) for k = 1..n+1. (End)
EXAMPLE
Table starts
..2..3..4..5...6...7...8...9...10...11...12....13....14....15....16.....17
..3..5..8.12..17..23..30..38...47...57...68....80....93...107...122....138
..4..7.12.20..32..49..72.102..140..187..244...312...392...485...592....714
..5..9.16.28..48..80.129.201..303..443..630...874..1186..1578..2063...2655
..6.11.20.36..64.112.192.321..522..825.1268..1898..2772..3958..5536...7599
..7.13.24.44..80.144.256.448..769.1291.2116..3384..5282..8054.12012..17548
..8.15.28.52..96.176.320.576.1024.1793.3084..5200..8584.13866.21920..33932
..9.17.32.60.112.208.384.704.1280.2304.4097..7181.12381.20965.34831..56751
.10.19.36.68.128.240.448.832.1536.2816.5120..9217.16398.28779.49744..84575
.11.21.40.76.144.272.512.960.1792.3328.6144.11264.20481.36879.65658.115402
Some solutions for 5 X 3:
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
Some solutions for T(5,3): By taking the sums of the columns in the above arrays we get 555, 100, 000, 543, 322, 432, 554. - Miquel A. Fiol, Feb 04 2024
MAPLE
T:= (n, k)-> `if`(k<=n+1, (2*n+3-k)*2^(k-2), (n+1-k)*binomial(k-1, n) * add(binomial(n, j-1)/(k-j)*T(n, j)*(-1)^(n-j), j=1..n+1)): seq(seq(T(n, 1+d-n), n=1..d), d=1..15); #Alois P. Heinz in the Sequence Fans Mailing List, Apr 04 2011 [We do not permit programs based on conjectures, but this program is now justified by Fiol's comment. - N. J. A. Sloane, Mar 09 2024]
CROSSREFS
Diagonal is A045623.
Column 4 is A086570.
Upper diagonals T(n,n+i) for i=1..8 give: A001792, A001787(n+1), A000337(n+1), A045618, A045889, A034009, A055250, A055251.
Lower diagonals T(n+i,n) for i=1..7 give: A045891(n+1), A034007(n+2), A111297(n+1), A159694(n-1), A159695(n-1), A159696(n-1), A159697(n-1).
Antidiagonal sums give A065220(n+5).
Sequence in context: A321440 A115729 A115728 * A335680 A026354 A375464
KEYWORD
nonn,tabl
AUTHOR
R. H. Hardin, Apr 04 2011
STATUS
approved