login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A289037
Positions of 1 in A289035; complement of A289036.
5
3, 6, 9, 13, 16, 20, 23, 26, 30, 33, 37, 40, 43, 47, 50, 54, 57, 61, 64, 67, 71, 74, 78, 81, 84, 88, 91, 95, 98, 102, 105, 108, 112, 115, 119, 122, 125, 129, 132, 136, 139, 142, 146, 149, 153, 156, 160, 163, 166, 170, 173, 177, 180, 183, 187, 190, 194, 197
OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
Conjecture: a(n)/n -> 2 + sqrt(2), and 0 < 2 + sqrt(2) - a(n)/n < -1 + sqrt(2) for n >= 1.
From Michel Dekking, Mar 20 2022: (Start)
Proof of (a part of) Kimberling's conjecture. This is based on the formula for the recursion in the FORMULA section of A293077, where we use that the final-letter-removed version of the String-Replace map has the same fixed point A289035.
Let N1(n) be the number of 1's in the n-th iterate theta(n) of the final-letter-removed mapping defined in A289035. It was observed in A293077 that N1(n) = L(n-1)/2, where L(n) = A293077(n) is the length of the n-th iterate theta(n) of the final-letter-removed mapping. As usual, proving a(n)/n -> 2 + sqrt(2) is the same as proving that the frequency of 1's in A293077 is equal to 1/(2 + sqrt(2)) = 1 - sqrt(2)/2 =: mu. Ignoring a proof of the existence of the limit, this means that we have to show that
N1(n) /L(n) -> 1 - sqrt(2)/2 as n->oo.
By the observation above this is the same as proving that
L(n-1)/2L(n) -> 1 - sqrt(2)/2 as n->oo.
We know from A293077 that
L(n) = 2 L(n-1) - L(n-2) + 2 floor(L(n-2)/4).
For the determination of the limit we replace the term 2 floor(L(n-2)/4) by L(n-2)/2, as we may.
So we have L(n) ~ 2 L(n-1) - L(n-2)/2, which leads to
L(n)/2L(n+1) ~ 2 L(n-1)/2L(n+1) - L(n-2)/4L(n+1).
Replacing L(n-1)/L(n+1) by L(n-1)/2L(n)*2L(n)/L(n+1), and similarly for the last term, we obtain an equation for mu as n->oo:
mu = 4mu^2 - 2mu^3.
The solutions to this equation are 0, 1+sqrt(2)/2, and 1-sqrt(2)/2. Since 0<mu<1, it follows that mu = 1 - sqrt(2)/2.
Note: The full conjecture of Kimberling would follow from the conjecture A289035(n) = A171588(n-3) for n>3. (End)
Conjecture: a(n+1) - a(n) = A276864(n) for all n. - Michel Dekking, Mar 20 2022
From Michel Dekking, Mar 22 2022: (Start)
The arguments given in the proof above carry over to the positions of 1 in the sequences A288997, A289001, A289011, A289025, A289035, A289071, A289239, and A289242. It follows that for all these sequences x(n)/n -> 2 + sqrt(2), where x(n) is the position of the n-th 1 in these sequences.
Note that this does not apply to the sequence A289165 where the String-Replace map is not equal to a two-block map because the 2-block 11 occurs at position 85 in A289165. (End)
LINKS
MATHEMATICA
z = 10; (* number of iterates *)
s = {0, 0}; w[0] = StringJoin[Map[ToString, s]];
w[n_] := StringReplace[w[n - 1], {"00" -> "0010", "01" -> "010", "10" -> "010"}]
TableForm[Table[w[n], {n, 0, 10}]]
st = ToCharacterCode[w[z]] - 48 (* A289035 *)
Flatten[Position[st, 0]] (* A289036 *)
Flatten[Position[st, 1]] (* A289037 *)
CROSSREFS
Sequence in context: A066343 A172262 A184909 * A060605 A325228 A278449
KEYWORD
nonn,easy
AUTHOR
Clark Kimberling, Jun 27 2017
STATUS
approved