login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A344444
Completely additive with a(2) = 12, a(3) = 19; for prime p > 3, a(p) = ceiling((a(p-1) + a(p+1))/2).
2
0, 12, 19, 24, 28, 31, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 55, 56, 57, 57, 58, 59, 59, 60, 60, 61, 61, 62, 62, 63, 63, 64, 64, 65, 65, 66, 66, 66, 67, 67, 67, 68, 68, 68, 69, 69, 69, 70, 70, 70, 71, 71, 71, 72, 72, 72, 72, 73, 73, 73, 73, 74, 74
OFFSET
1,2
COMMENTS
Monotonic until a(143) = 87 > 86 = a(144).
The only infinite monotonic completely additive integer sequence is the all 0's sequence (cf. A000004). The challenge taken up here is to specify one that is monotonic for a modestly long number of terms, using a comparatively short prescriptive definition.
To start we specify values for a(2) and a(3) so that a(3)/a(2) approximates log(3)/log(2). 19/12 is a good approximation relative to the size of denominator. This reflects 2^19 = 524288 having a similar magnitude to 3^12 = 531441. Equivalently, we can say 3 is approximately the 19th power of the 12th root of 2. This approximation is used to construct musical scales. (See the Enevoldsen link, also A143800.) There is no better approximation with a denominator smaller than 29. [Revised by Peter Munn, Jun 14 2022]
To find a good specification to use for a(p) for larger primes, p, we are guided by knowing that if 2*a(n) < a(n-1) + a(n+1) then a completely additive sequence is not monotonic after a(n^2-1) because a(n^2) < a((n-1)*(n+1)) = a(n^2-1). Considering n = p, we see we want a(p) >= (a(p-1) + a(p+1))/2; but the same consideration for n = p-1 shows we don't want a(p) larger than necessary. These considerations lead towards the choice of "a(p) = ceiling((a(p-1) + a(p+1))/2)" for use in the definition.
FORMULA
a(n*k) = a(n) + a(k).
EXAMPLE
a(4) = a(2*2) = a(2) + a(2) from the definition of completely additive. So a(4) = 12 + 12 = 24. Similarly, a(6) = a(2*3) = a(2) + a(3) = 12 + 19 = 31.
5 is a prime number greater than 3, so a(5) = ceiling((a(5-1) + a(5+1))/2). Using the values a(4) = 24 and a(6) = 31 that we calculated earlier, we get a(5) = ceiling((24 + 31)/2) = ceiling(27.5) = 28.
The sequence is defined as completely additive, so a(1) = 0, the identity element for addition. (To see this, note that "completely additive" implies a(2) = a(2*1) = a(2)+a(1), and solve the equation for a(1).)
MATHEMATICA
a[1] = 0; a[n_] := a[n] = Plus @@ ((Last[#] * Which[First[#] == 2, 12, First[#] == 3, 19, First[#] > 3, Ceiling[(a[First[#] - 1] + a[First[#] + 1])/2]]) & /@ FactorInteger[n]); Array[a, 100] (* Amiram Eldar, Jun 27 2021 *)
CROSSREFS
Equivalent sequence with a(2)=5, a(3)=8: A344443.
First 10 terms match A143800.
Cf. row 23 of A352957.
For other completely additive sequences see the references in A104244.
Sequence in context: A342071 A107911 A143800 * A231290 A003335 A030609
KEYWORD
nonn,easy
AUTHOR
Peter Munn, May 20 2021
STATUS
approved