login
A334127
Number of nonempty sets {p_1, p_2, ..., p_k} such that Product_{i=1..k} p_i divides Product_{i=1..k} (n + p_i), where the p_i are distinct primes.
0
1, 3, 4, 7, 6, 19, 8, 17, 8, 25, 12, 105, 8, 35, 22, 24, 16, 59, 28, 77, 30, 26, 22, 159, 8, 117, 23, 161, 26, 787, 32, 69, 46, 57, 30, 534, 32, 69, 90, 137, 22, 707, 20, 266, 54, 73, 50, 423, 38, 626, 62, 229, 52, 1324, 220, 489, 130, 285, 58, 2943, 24, 119, 274, 171, 202, 12089, 46, 181, 158, 201, 66, 1999, 58, 391, 234, 917, 126, 451, 42, 1767, 73, 1034, 86, 34691, 81, 150, 142, 233, 94, 18319, 226, 477, 70, 477, 114, 4419, 54, 157, 234, 2252
OFFSET
1,2
COMMENTS
a(n) is always finite. Proof: let p_1 < p_2 < ... < p_k, we can prove p_k <= 2*n^2 + n. If p_k > 2*n^2 + n, then 2*p_k > p_k + n, thus p_k - n is in the set. If p_k - m*n is in the set and m < n, then 2*(p_k - m*n) > p_k + n, thus p_k - (m+1)*n is in the set. Therefore, p_k - m*n are in the set for 0 <= m <= n. Since p_k - n*n > n + 1, p_k - m*n can be divisible by n + 1 for some m <= n, which is a contradiction to the p_i being primes.
EXAMPLE
For n = 3, {3}, {2, 3}, {2, 5} and {2, 3, 5} are such sets, thus a(3) = 4.
PROG
(PARI) a(n, k=primepi(2*n^2+n)) = {my(c=-1, p=primes(k)); forsubset(k, v, if(vecprod(vector(#v, i, p[v[i]]+n))%vecprod(vector(#v, i, p[v[i]])) == 0, c++)); c; }
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Jinyuan Wang, May 10 2020
EXTENSIONS
Terms a(13) onward from Max Alekseyev, Apr 08 2025
STATUS
approved