OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
Since the so-called beastly primes (containing the digit string 666) were mentioned recently in a Numberphile video (see link), I guess it is now OK to include these numbers (which are based on the old convention that your fax number was one more than your telephone number) in the OEIS.
Note that there is no analog of A232448, because 1 0^k 667 0^k 1 is always divisible by 3 and is never prime.
LINKS
Tony Padilla and Brady Haran, The Most Evil Number, Numberphile Video, October 2018
Margaret Wertheim, The Fax Numbers of the Beast, and Other Mathematical Sports: An Interview with Neil Sloane, Cabinet Magazine, Issue 57, Spring 2015, pages 48-54.
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn,base
AUTHOR
N. J. A. Sloane, Nov 01 2018
STATUS
approved