login
A306112
Largest k such that 2^k has exactly n digits 0 (in base 10), conjectured.
9
86, 229, 231, 359, 283, 357, 475, 476, 649, 733, 648, 696, 824, 634, 732, 890, 895, 848, 823, 929, 1092, 1091, 1239, 1201, 1224, 1210, 1141, 1339, 1240, 1282, 1395, 1449, 1416, 1408, 1616, 1524, 1727, 1725, 1553, 1942, 1907, 1945, 1870, 1724, 1972, 1965, 2075, 1983, 2114, 2257, 2256
OFFSET
0,1
COMMENTS
a(0) is the largest term in A007377: exponents of powers of 2 without digit 0.
There is no proof for any of the terms, just as for any term of A020665 and many similar / related sequences. However, the search has been pushed to many magnitudes beyond the largest known term, and the probability of any of the terms being wrong is extremely small, cf., e.g., the Khovanova link.
LINKS
M. F. Hasler, Zeroless powers, OEIS Wiki, March 2014, updated 2018.
T. Khovanova, The 86-conjecture, Tanya Khovanova's Math Blog, Feb. 2011.
W. Schneider, No Zeros, 2000, updated 2003. (On web.archive.org--see A007496 for a cached copy.)
PROG
(PARI) A306112_vec(nMax, M=99*nMax+199, x=2, a=vector(nMax+=2))={for(k=0, M, a[min(1+#select(d->!d, digits(x^k)), nMax)]=k); a[^-1]}
CROSSREFS
Cf. A031146: least k such that 2^k has n digits 0 in base 10.
Cf. A305942: number of k's such that 2^k has n digits 0.
Cf. A305932: row n lists exponents of 2^k with n digits 0.
Cf. A007377: { k | 2^k has no digit 0 } : row 0 of the above.
Cf. A238938: { 2^k having no digit 0 }.
Cf. A027870: number of 0's in 2^n (and A065712, A065710, A065714, A065715, A065716, A065717, A065718, A065719, A065744 for digits 1 .. 9).
Cf. A102483: 2^n contains no 0 in base 3.
Sequence in context: A097693 A184087 A304518 * A184086 A113690 A043379
KEYWORD
nonn,base
AUTHOR
M. F. Hasler, Jun 22 2018
STATUS
approved