login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A063904
a(1) = 2, a(2) = 3 and a(k+1) is the least prime not already chosen that divides some a(i)*a(j)+1, where 1<=i<j<=k.
1
2, 3, 7, 5, 11, 13, 17, 23, 29, 19, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 139, 149, 151, 157, 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 199, 211, 223, 227, 229, 233, 239, 241, 251, 257, 263, 269, 271
OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
"Does the sequence [above] contain every prime? Is the sequence infinite?" ... "The sequence of problem [above] is not even known to be infinite, though it almost surely contains every prime. We do not know whether anyone has attacked the problem computationally; perhaps you, the reader, would like to give it a try. The problem is due to M. Newman at the Australian Nation University." - Crandall and Pomerance
Indices of primes in this sequence: 1, 2, 4, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, ..., . It appears that only the primes 7 and 19 are out of order in the first 1000. - Robert G. Wilson v, Apr 12 2006 [corrected by Sergey Pavlov, Apr 26 2017]
No more out-of-order primes up to 100 billion. - Charles R Greathouse IV, Apr 26 2010.
REFERENCES
R. Crandall and C. Pomerance, Prime Numbers: A Computational Perspective, Springer, NY, 2001; see p. 6.
EXAMPLE
a(3) is equal to 7 because a(1)*a(2)+1 = 2*3+1 = 7.
MATHEMATICA
a = {2, 3}; Do[len = Length@a; AppendTo[a, Complement[a, Union@ Flatten@ Table[ First /@ FactorInteger[a[[i]]*a[[j]] + 1], {i, len}, {j, i}]] [[1]]], {n, 3, 60}]; a
CROSSREFS
Cf. A063884.
Sequence in context: A275205 A327093 A171039 * A297929 A221858 A139317
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Robert G. Wilson v, Sep 04 2001
EXTENSIONS
Comment and cross-reference from Charles R Greathouse IV, Apr 26 2010
STATUS
approved