|
|
A045883
|
|
a(n) = ((3*n+1)*2^n - (-1)^n)/9.
|
|
27
|
|
|
0, 1, 3, 9, 23, 57, 135, 313, 711, 1593, 3527, 7737, 16839, 36409, 78279, 167481, 356807, 757305, 1601991, 3378745, 7107015, 14913081, 31224263, 65244729, 136081863, 283348537, 589066695, 1222872633, 2535223751, 5249404473, 10856722887, 22429273657, 46290203079
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
0,3
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Number of rises (drops) in the compositions of n-2 with parts in N.
This sequence is connected with the Collatz problem. We consider the array T(i,j) where the i-th row gives the parity trajectory of i, for example for i = 6, the infinite trajectory is 6 -> 3 -> 10 ->5 -> 16 ->8 -> 4 -> 2 -> 1 -> 4 -> 2 -> 1 -> 4->2-> 1 ... and T(6,j) = [0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,...,1,0,0,1,...]. Now, we consider the sum of the digits 1 of each array T(i,j), where
a(1) = sum of the digits "1" of T(i,j), i = 1..2^1 and j = 1;
a(2) = sum of the digits "1" of T(i,j), i = 1..2^2 and j = 1..2;
a(3) = sum of the digits "1" of T(i,j), i = 1..2^3 and j = 1..3;
a(n) = Sum_{i=1..2^n}(Sum_{j=1..n} T(i,j)) = Sum_{i=1..n} A001045(n)*2^(n-i) = convolution of A001045 and A000079 (see the formula below).
The number of digits "0" equals A113861(n) = n*2^n - a(n) because n and 2^n are the dimensions of each array.
An important result is that the ratio r = A113861(n) / A045883(n) tends towards 2 when n tends towards infinity. In other words, when the array tends towards infinity, the ratio r = (number of divisions by 2) / (number of multiplications by 3) tends towards 2, even if there exists divergent trajectories. That is the problem! For each possible divergent infinite trajectory, r < 2 even though the global ratio r is 2.
Conclusion:
1. For each number n with a convergent trajectory T(n,k), k = 1..infinity, or for each row of the array T(i,j), the ratio r tends towards 2 (the proof is easy because the trajectory becomes periodic from a certain index 1001001001...).
2. For each array of dimension n X 2^n, the radio r tends towards 2.
3. If there exists a number n such that the trajectory is divergent, this trajectory is random and r tends towards a real x such that 1 < = r < = x < 2.
4. In order to establish a proof of the Collatz problem from this considerations (if that is possible), it is necessary to prove that a ratio < 2 for an infinite row (or several rows) of an infinite array T(i,j) is incompatible with r = 2, the exact ratio for this array. (End)
a(n) is the distance spectral radius of the dimension-regular generalized recursive circulant graph (commonly known as multiplicative circulant graph) of order 2^n. - John Rafael M. Antalan, Sep 25 2020
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
FORMULA
|
G.f.: x/((1+x)*(1-2*x)^2).
a(n) = 3*a(n-1) - 4*a(n-3).
a(n) = f(n)*2^n, where f(n) is a rational Fibonacci type sequence based on fuse(a,b) = (a+b+1)/2 with f(0) = 0, f(1) = 1/2 and f(n) = fuse(f(n-1), f(n-2)), for n >= 2. For fuse(a,b) see the Jeff Erickson link under A188545. Proof with f(n) = (3*n+1 - (-1)^n/2^n)/9, n >= 0, by induction.
a(n) = a(n-1) + 2*a(n-2) + 2^(n-1), n >= 0, with input a(-2) = 1/4 and a(-1) = 0. See also A127984. (End)
|
|
MAPLE
|
|
|
MATHEMATICA
|
nn=31; a=x^2(1-x)/(1-x-2x^2)/(1-2x); b=x^2/(1-2x)^2; Drop[CoefficientList[Series[(b-a)/2, {x, 0, nn}], x], 2] (* Geoffrey Critzer, Mar 21 2014 *)
CoefficientList[Series[x / ((1 + x) (1 - 2 x)^2), {x, 0, 33}], x] (* Vincenzo Librandi, Jun 15 2017 *)
|
|
PROG
|
(PARI) {a(n) = if( n<-1, 0, ((3*n + 1)*2^n - (-1)^n) / 9)};
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
easy,nonn
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
EXTENSIONS
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|
|
|