This site is supported by donations to The OEIS Foundation.

Platonic numbers

From OeisWiki
(Redirected from Dodecahedral numbers)
Jump to: navigation, search

The five regular convex polyhedra (3-dimensional regular convex solids, known as the 5 Platonic solids), are

The tetrahedron is self-dual, the cube and the octahedron are duals, and the dodecahedron and icosahedron are duals. (Dual pairs have same number of edges and have vertices corresponding to faces of each other.)

Number of vertices, edges and faces of the 5 Platonic solids:

  • A063723 Number of vertices in the Platonic solids (in the order tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, icosahedron).
  • A063722 Number of edges in the Platonic solids (in the order tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, icosahedron).
  • A053016 Number of faces of Platonic solids (in the order tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, icosahedron).
The Platonic numbers (A053012) are the numbers of dots in a layered geometric arrangement into one of the 5 Platonic solids.[1] The platonic numbers start with one initial dot (for 
n = 1
), then with one dot at each vertex of a given Platonic solid (for 
n = 2
), with each of the following layers growing out of the initial vertex with one more dot per edge than the preceding layer, and where overlapping dots (the dot at the initial vertex and the dots on all the edges sharing that initial vertex) are counted only once.

The 5 types of Platonic numbers (by increasing number of vertices) are:

  • A000292 Tetrahedral (or triangular pyramidal) numbers: 
    (  n + 23  ) =
    n (n + 1) (n + 2)
    6
    .
  • A005900 Octahedral numbers: 
    2n 3 + n
    3
    =
    n (2n 2 + 1)
    3
    .
  • A000578 The cubes: 
    n 3
    .
  • A006564 Icosahedral numbers: 
    n (5n 2  −  5n + 2)
    2
    .
  • A006566 Dodecahedral numbers: 
    n (9n 2  −  9n + 2)
    2
    =
    n (3n  −  1) (3n  −  2)
    2
    =
    3n (3n  −  1) (3n  −  2)
    6
    = (  3n3  )
    .

All figurate numbers are accessible via this structured menu: Classifications of figurate numbers.

Formulae

The 
n
th Platonic 
N2
-hedral number (having 
N0
vertices) is given by the formulae:[2]
P  (3)N0(n) = (  n + 23  ) + (N0  −  4) (  n + 13  ) + 0 (  n3  )
, for the (self dual) tetrahedral ( 
N0 = 4
) numbers;
P  (3)N0(n) = (  n + 23  ) + (N0  −  4) (  n + 13  ) + 1 (  n3  )
for the (dual pair) octahedral ( 
N0 = 6
) and hexahedral (cubic) ( 
N0 = 8
) numbers;
P  (3)N0(n) = (  n + 23  ) + (N0  −  4) (  n + 13  ) + (
N0
2
) (  n3  )
for the (dual pair) icosahedral ( 
N0 = 12
) and dodecahedral ( 
N0 = 20
) numbers.
where 
N0
is the number of 0-dimensional elements (vertices 
V
), 
N1
is the number of 1-dimensional elements (edges 
E
), 
N2
is the number of 2-dimensional elements (faces 
F
) of the polyhedron. 
N0 = (2r  −  0r ) + 4
is the number of vertices of the Platonic solid, where 
r ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}
is the rank of the Platonic solid (by increasing number of vertices).

Platonic roots

Tetrahedral roots

The tetrahedral roots of 
n
are defined as the roots 
r
of the cubic equation

hence

Cube roots

The cube roots of 
n
are defined as the roots 
r
of the cubic equation

yielding

Octahedral roots

The octahedral roots of 
n
are defined as the roots 
r
of the cubic equation

hence

Dodecahedral roots

The dodecahedral roots of 
n
are defined as the roots 
r
of the cubic equation

hence

Icosahedral roots

The icosahedral roots of 
n
are defined as the roots 
r
of the cubic equation

hence

Descartes–Euler (convex) polyhedral formula

Descartes–Euler (convex) polyhedral formula:[3]

where 
N0
is the number of 0-dimensional elements (vertices 
V
), 
N1
is the number of 1-dimensional elements (edges 
E
), 
N2
is the number of 2-dimensional elements (faces 
F
) of the polyhedron.

Recurrence relation

with initial conditions

Ordinary generating function

for the (self dual) tetrahedral (rank 
r = 0, N0 = 4
vertices) numbers;
for the (dual pair) octahedral (rank 
r = 1, N0 = 6
vertices) and hexahedral (cubic) (rank 
r = 2, N0 = 8
vertices) numbers;
for the (dual pair) icosahedral (rank 
r = 3, N0 = 12
vertices) and dodecahedral (rank 
r = 4, N0 = 20
vertices) numbers. 
N0 = (2r  −  0r )  +  4
is the number of vertices of the Platonic solid, where 
r ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}
is the rank of the Platonic solid (by increasing number of vertices).

Exponential generating function

For the 4-face numbers:

For the 8-face and 6-face numbers:

For the 20-face and 12-face numbers:

Dirichlet generating function

For the 4-face numbers:

For the 8-face and 6-face numbers:

For the 20-face and 12-face numbers:

Order of basis

In 1638, Fermat proposed that every positive integer is a sum of at most three triangular numbers, four square numbers, five pentagonal numbers, and 
k
k
-gon numbers. Fermat claimed to have a proof of this result, although Fermat's proof has never been found.[4] Joseph Louis Lagrange proved the square case (known as the four squares theorem) in 1770 and Gauss proved the triangular case in 1796. In 1813, Cauchy finally proved the horizontal generalization that every nonnegative integer can be written as a sum of 
k
k
-gon numbers (known as the polygonal number theorem), while a vertical (higher dimensional) generalization has also been made (known as the Hilbert-Waring problem). A nonempty subset 
A
of nonnegative integers is called a basis of order 
g
if 
g
is the minimum number with the property that every nonnegative integer can be written as a sum of 
g
elements in 
A
. Lagrange’s sum of four squares can be restated as the set 
{n 2 | n = 0, 1, 2, }
of nonnegative squares forms a basis of order 4.
Theorem. (Cauchy)

For every 
k   ≥   3
, the set 
{P (k, n) | n = 0, 1, 2, }
of 
k
-gon numbers forms a basis of order 
k
, i.e. every nonnegative integer can be written as a sum of 
k
k
-gon numbers.

Proof. PROOF GOES HERE. (Provide proof: PROOF GOES HERE. □)[5]
We note that polygonal numbers are two dimensional analogues of squares. Obviously, cubes, fourth powers, fifth powers, ... are higher dimensional analogues of squares. In 1770, Waring stated without proof that every nonnegative integer can be written as a sum of 4 squares, 9 cubes, 19 fourth powers, and so on. In 1909, Hilbert proved that there is a finite number 
g (d)
such that every nonnegative integer is a sum of 
g (d)
d
th powers, i.e. the set 
{nd | n = 0, 1, 2, }
of 
d
th powers forms a basis of order 
g (d)
. The Hilbert-Waring problem is concerned with the study of 
g (d)
for 
d   ≥   2
. This problem was one of the most important research topics in additive number theory in last 90 years, and it is still a very active area of research.

Differences

Partial sums

The partial sums correspond to 4-dimensional Platonic hyperpyramidal numbers.

Partial sums of reciprocals

Sum of reciprocals

The sum of reciprocals 

n  = 1
1
P  (3) 6(n)
= ζ (3)
can be interpreted as 
1
p
, where 
p =
1
ζ (3)
is the probability that three random integers 
x
, 
y
and 
z
are coprime.[6]

Table of formulae and values

N0, N1
and 
N2
are the number of vertices (0-dimensional), edges (1-dimensional) and faces (2-dimensional) respectively, where the faces are the actual facets. The regular Platonic numbers are listed by increasing number 
N0
of vertices.
Platonic numbers formulae and values
Rank

r


N0

(2r − 0r ) + 4
Name

(N0, N1, N2)


Schläfli
symbol[7]
Formulae

P  (3)N0(n)
Generating
function

G{P  (3)N0(n)}(x)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A-number
0 4 Tetrahedral

(4, 6, 4)

{3, 3}


[8]



0 1 4 10 20 35 56 84 120 165 220 286 364 A000292
1 6 Octahedral

(6, 12, 8)

{3, 4}



[9]


(Square dipyramidal numbers)



0 1 6 19 44 85 146 231 344 489 670 891 1156 A005900
2 8 Cube

(8, 12, 6)

{4, 3}



0 1 8 27 64 125 216 343 512 729 1000 1331 1728 A000578
3 12 Icosahedral

(12, 30, 20)

{3, 5}




0 1 12 48 124 255 456 742 1128 1629 2260 3036 3972 A006564
4 20 Dodecahedral

(20, 30, 12)

{5, 3}









0 1 20 84 220 455 816 1330 2024 2925 4060 5456 7140 A006566

Table of related formulae and values

N0, N1
and
N2
are the number of vertices (0-dimensional), edges (1-dimensional) and faces (2-dimensional) respectively, where the faces are the actual facets. The regular Platonic numbers are listed by increasing number
N0
of vertices.
Platonic numbers related formulae and values
Rank


r



N0


(2r  −  0r  ) + 4
Name


(N0, N1, N2)


Schläfli symbol[7]
Order
of basis[10][11]

g{P  (3)N0(n)}


N0 + ?
Differences


P  (3)N0(n)  −  P  (3)N0(n  −  1)
Partial sums


m
n  = 1
   P  (3)N0(n)
Partial sums
of reciprocals

m
n  = 1
  
1
P  (3)N0(n)
Sum of Reciprocals[12][13]


n  = 1
  
1
P  (3)N0(n)
0 4 Tetrahedral

(4, 6, 4)
{3, 3}



[14]
1 6 Octahedral

(6, 12, 8)
{3, 4}






[15] [16]


Base 10: A175577
2 8 Cube

(8, 12, 6)
{4, 3}






[17][18]


Base 10: A002117
3 12 Icosahedral

(12, 30, 20)
{3, 5}






[15][16]


Base 10: A175578
4 20 Dodecahedral

(20, 30, 12)
{5, 3}









Table of sequences

Platonic numbers sequences
N0
P  (3)N0(n), n   ≥   0.
A-number
4
{0, 1, 4, 10, 20, 35, 56, 84, 120, 165, 220, 286, 364, 455, 560, 680, 816, 969, 1140, 1330, 1540, 1771, 2024, 2300, 2600, 2925, 3276, 3654, 4060, 4495, 4960, 5456, ...}
A000292
6
{0, 1, 6, 19, 44, 85, 146, 231, 344, 489, 670, 891, 1156, 1469, 1834, 2255, 2736, 3281, 3894, 4579, 5340, 6181, 7106, 8119, 9224, 10425, 11726, 13131, 14644, 16269, ...}
A005900
8
{0, 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216, 343, 512, 729, 1000, 1331, 1728, 2197, 2744, 3375, 4096, 4913, 5832, 6859, 8000, 9261, 10648, 12167, 13824, 15625, 17576, 19683, 21952, ...}
A000578
12
{0, 1, 12, 48, 124, 255, 456, 742, 1128, 1629, 2260, 3036, 3972, 5083, 6384, 7890, 9616, 11577, 13788, 16264, 19020, 22071, 25432, 29118, 33144, 37525, 42276, 47412, ...}
A006564
20
{0, 1, 20, 84, 220, 455, 816, 1330, 2024, 2925, 4060, 5456, 7140, 9139, 11480, 14190, 17296, 20825, 24804, 29260, 34220, 39711, 45760, 52394, 59640, 67525, 76076, ...}
A006566

See also

Notes

  1. Weisstein, Eric W., Platonic Solid, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.
  2. Where 
    P  (d)N0(n)
    is the 
    d
    -dimensional regular convex polytope number with 
    N0
    vertices.
  3. Weisstein, Eric W., Polyhedral Formula, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.
  4. Weisstein, Eric W., Polygonal Number Theorem, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.
  5. Needs proof.
  6. Weisstein, Eric W., Relatively Prime, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Weisstein, Eric W., Schläfli Symbol, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.
  8. Weisstein, Eric W., Rising Factorial, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.
  9. Where 
    Y   (d ) [(k  +  2)  +  (d  −  2)] (n) = Y   (d )k  +  d (n)
    , 
    k   ≥   1, n   ≥   0,
    is the 
    d
    -dimensional, 
    d   ≥   0
    , 
    (k  +  2)
    -gonal base (hyper)pyramidal number where, for 
    d   ≥   2
    , 
    N0 = [(k  +  2)  +  (d  −  2)]
    is the number of vertices (including the 
    d  −  2
    apex vertices) of the polygonal base (hyper)pyramid.
  10. Hyun Kwang Kim, On Regular Polytope Numbers.
  11. Pollock, Frederick, On the extension of the principle of Fermat’s theorem on the polygonal numbers to the higher order of series whose ultimate differences are constant. With a new theorem proposed, applicable to all the orders, Abstracts of the Papers Communicated to the Royal Society of London, 5 (1850) pp. 922-924.
  12. Downey, Lawrence M., Ong, Boon W., and Sellers, James A., Beyond the Basel Problem: Sums of Reciprocals of Figurate Numbers, 2008.
  13. Psychedelic Geometry, Inverse Polygonal Nunbers Series.
  14. User:Jaume Oliver Lafont/Sum of Reciprocals of Tetrahedral Numbers
  15. 15.0 15.1 Weisstein, Eric W., Euler-Mascheroni Constant, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Weisstein, Eric W., Digamma Function, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.
  17. Sondow, Jonathan and Weisstein, Eric W., Riemann Zeta Function, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource, created by Eric W. Weisstein.
  18. Weisstein, Eric W., Apéry's Constant, from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource.

External links