login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A330280
Least number of 2 X 2 rotations required to solve an n X n Simon Tatham's Twiddle puzzle.
1
OFFSET
1,2
COMMENTS
The puzzle is as follows. An n X n grid is filled with distinct integers from 1 to n*n, such that the number at row r and column c (both 0-based) is n*n - (r*n + c). The task is to perform rotations of 2 X 2 sub-grids (moves) to bring the numbers into their natural order, i.e., the number at row r and column c should become r*n + c + 1. Rotations are by 90 degrees in the clockwise or counterclockwise direction. See links for example puzzles and solutions.
Wladimir Leite found strong upper bounds for the next few terms: 48, 88 and 146 (see links). - Dmitry Kamenetsky, Apr 20 2020
LINKS
greenturtle3141, What is the strategy to solve Simon Tatham's Twiddle?, Puzzling StackExchange, Dec 24 2016.
greenturtle3141, A Guide to the Number Rotation Puzzle, Puzzling StackExchange, May 27 2019.
Dmitry Kamenetsky, Rotating numbers in a 3x3 grid, Puzzling StackExchange, Feb 15 2020.
Dmitry Kamenetsky and Wladimir Leite, Best known solutions for 3 <= n <= 7
Simon Tatham, Twiddle 3x3 puzzle
CROSSREFS
Sequence in context: A316451 A120845 A373276 * A293412 A224837 A049450
KEYWORD
nonn,hard,more
AUTHOR
Dmitry Kamenetsky, Feb 29 2020
EXTENSIONS
Removed a(5) as it was found to be suboptimal - Dmitry Kamenetsky, Apr 16 2020
STATUS
approved