

A319852


Difference between 3^n and the product of primes less than or equal to n.


2



0, 2, 7, 21, 75, 213, 699, 1977, 6351, 19473, 58839, 174837, 529131, 1564293, 4752939, 14318877, 43016691, 128629653, 386909979, 1152561777, 3477084711, 10450653513, 31371359919, 93920085957, 282206443611, 847065516573, 2541642735459, 7625374392117, 22876569362091
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)



OFFSET

0,2


COMMENTS

From Rosser (1941), it seems that the tightest possible upper bound is somewhere between e^n and 2.83^n. Therefore 3^n is the best possible upper bound with an integer base and integer exponent.  Alonso del Arte, Oct 22 2018


LINKS

Table of n, a(n) for n=0..28.
Barkley Rosser, "Explicit Bounds for Some Functions of Prime Numbers", Amer. J. Math., 1941, 63 (1) p. 228, Lemma 21.
J. Barkley Rosser, Lowell Schoenfeld, Approximate formulas for some functions of prime numbers, Illinois J. Math. 6 1962, 6494.


FORMULA

a(n) = 3^n  n#, where n# = A034386(n) is the product of the primes less than or equal to n.


EXAMPLE

3^5 = 243. The primes less than or equal to 5 are: 2, 3, 5. Then 2 * 3 * 5 = 30 and hence a(5) = 243  30 = 213.


MATHEMATICA

Table[3^n  Times@@Select[Range[n], PrimeQ], {n, 0, 26}]


PROG

(PARI) a(n) = 3^nfactorback(primes(primepi(n))) \\ David A. Corneth, Oct 22 2018


CROSSREFS

Cf. A000244, A034386, A319857.
Sequence in context: A274203 A220726 A127540 * A060900 A305850 A151289
Adjacent sequences: A319849 A319850 A319851 * A319853 A319854 A319855


KEYWORD

nonn


AUTHOR

Alonso del Arte, Sep 29 2018


EXTENSIONS

Many thanks to Amiram Eldar for several bibliographic citations on this topic.


STATUS

approved



