login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A305024
Minimal number of squares, not all equal to 1, having as sum prime(n), such that their squares also sum to a prime; 0 if no such decomposition exists.
1
0, 0, 2, 4, 3, 2, 2, 3, 4, 2, 4, 2, 2, 3, 7, 2, 5, 4, 4, 4, 2, 4, 3, 2, 3, 3, 5, 3, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 4, 2, 4, 4, 4, 3, 2, 3, 4, 4, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 4, 2, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 3
OFFSET
1,3
COMMENTS
It has been conjectured (cf. A126769) that any prime p >= 5 can be written in a nontrivial way as p = Sum (b_i)^2 such that Sum (b_i)^4 is also prime. This sequence lists the number of required terms b_i for each prime.
The two initial zeros say that this decomposition is not possible for prime(1) = 2 and prime(2) = 3, and are thus conjectured to be the only zeros of the sequence. Since we are interested in the minimal number of terms, we can consider only nonzero b_i >= 1 and min{b_i} >= 2 to avoid the trivial solution b_i = 1 for all i <= k = prime(n).
LINKS
FORMULA
If
EXAMPLE
The first two primes, 2 and 3, cannot be written as a sum of squares not all equal to 1, because the smallest such sum is 1^2 + 2^2 = 5. (The empty sum and a one-term sum of a square cannot be prime, either.) Therefore a(1) = a(2) = 0.
The third prime, 5, can be written in exactly one way as a nontrivial sum of two squares, 5 = 1^2 + 2^2, and the sum of the fourth powers is 1^4 + 2^4 = 17, which is again prime. Therefore, a(3) = 2.
The fourth prime, 7, cannot be written as sum of 2 or 3 squares, but only 4 squares, as 7 = 1^2 + 1^2 + 1^2 + 2^2, and it turns out that sum of the fourth powers also yields a prime, 1^4 + 1^4 + 1^4 + 2^4 = 19. Therefore, a(4) = 4.
prime(15) = 47 = 1^2 + 2^2 + 2^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 + 3^2 + 4^2, and the sum of the fourth powers gives the prime 467. Since no smaller number of terms has this property, a(15) = 7.
prime(18) = 61 = 2^2 + 4^2 + 4^2 +5^2, and 2^4 + 4^4 + 4^4 +5^4 = 1153, a prime, and no smaller number of terms has this property, so a(18) = 4.
prime(27) = 103 = 1^2 + 4^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 + 6^2 and 1^4 + 4^4 + 5^4 + 5^4 + 6^4 = 2803, a prime, and no smaller number of terms has this property, so a(27) = 5.
The values 2, 3, 4, 5 appear for the first time at index n = 3, 5, 4, 17, and a(15) = 7. We don't know when the first 6 occurs, nor whether this happens at all.
Conjecture: The sequence is bounded.
Is it possible to show that no term of the sequence is larger than 7?
MAPLE
repss:= proc(n, k, i) option remember;
# lists of k squares >= i^2 summing to n
if k = 1 then
if issqr(n) and n >= i^2 then {[sqrt(n)]}
else {}
fi
elif n < k then {}
else
`union`(seq(map(t -> [j, op(t)], procname(n-j^2, k-1, j)), j=i..floor(sqrt(n))))
fi
end proc:
f:= proc(n) local p, k, i, S; global Rep;
p:= ithprime(n);
for k from 2 do
S:= select(t -> isprime(convert(map(`^`, t, 4), `+`)), repss(p, k, 1));
if nops(S) > 0 then Rep[n]:= S[1]; return k fi
od
end proc:
0, 0, seq(f(n), n=3..100); # Robert Israel, Dec 12 2019
MATHEMATICA
a[n_] := Block[{p = Prime@n, c, k=2}, c = Range[Sqrt[p]]^2; While[ k<p, If[ Select[ IntegerPartitions[ p, {k}, c], PrimeQ@ Total[ #^2] &, 1] != {}, Break[]]; k++]; If[k < p, k, 0]]; Array[a, 95] (* Giovanni Resta, Dec 12 2019 *)
PROG
(PARI) apply( A305024(n)={n=prime(n); for(k=2, n-3, my(s=sqrtint((n-k)\3+1), t);
forvec(b=vector(k-2, i, [1, s]), t=vecsum([t^4|t<-b]);
for(i=1, #s=sum2sqr(n-norml2(b))/* see A133388 for sum2sqr() */,
s[i][1]>0 && isprime(s[i][1]^4+s[i][2]^4+t) && return(k))/*end for i*/
, 1/*forvec:increasing*/))}, [1..95]) \\ Bug fixed: M. F. Hasler, Dec 12 2019
CROSSREFS
Sequence in context: A029717 A135567 A105972 * A064134 A238847 A011030
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
M. F. Hasler, May 23 2018
EXTENSIONS
Corrected by Robert Israel, Dec 12 2019
STATUS
approved