|
|
A297290
|
|
Numbers whose base-16 digits have greater up-variation than down-variation; see Comments.
|
|
4
|
|
|
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 103, 104, 105, 106
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,1
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Suppose that n has base-b digits b(m), b(m-1), ..., b(0). The base-b down-variation of n is the sum DV(n,b) of all d(i)-d(i-1) for which d(i) > d(i-1); the base-b up-variation of n is the sum UV(n,b) of all d(k-1)-d(k) for which d(k) < d(k-1). The total base-b variation of n is the sum TV(n,b) = DV(n,b) + UV(n,b). See the guide at A297330.
Differs from A296760 first at 258 = 102_16, which has the same number of rises and falls but UV =2 > DV=1. - R. J. Mathar, Jan 23 2018
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
106 in base-16: 6,10 having DV = 0, UV = 4, so that 106 is in the sequence.
|
|
MATHEMATICA
|
g[n_, b_] := Map[Total, GatherBy[Differences[IntegerDigits[n, b]], Sign]];
x[n_, b_] := Select[g[n, b], # < 0 &]; y[n_, b_] := Select[g[n, b], # > 0 &];
b = 16; z = 2000; p = Table[x[n, b], {n, 1, z}]; q = Table[y[n, b], {n, 1, z}];
w = Sign[Flatten[p /. {} -> {0}] + Flatten[q /. {} -> {0}]];
Take[Flatten[Position[w, -1]], 120] (* A297288 *)
Take[Flatten[Position[w, 0]], 120] (* A297289 *)
Take[Flatten[Position[w, 1]], 120] (* A297290 *)
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nonn,base,easy
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|
|
|