login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A214620
Numbers n such that at least one other integer m exists with the same smallest prime factor, same largest prime factor, and same set of binary digits as n.
3
18, 24, 36, 42, 48, 56, 70, 72, 84, 90, 96, 98, 112, 120, 135, 140, 144, 150, 154, 168, 170, 175, 180, 182, 186, 192, 196, 198, 204, 220, 224, 225, 234, 240, 242, 245, 248, 266, 270, 276, 279, 280, 286, 288, 294, 300, 304, 306, 308, 310, 312, 315, 322, 330, 336, 338
OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
Binary digits of m are a permutation of binary digits of n.
Conjecture: there is X such that among integers bigger than X more than 50% are in the sequence.
Since a set is an unordered collection of distinct elements, one should say "same multiset (or bag) of binary digits as n." - Daniel Forgues, Mar 31 2016
LINKS
EXAMPLE
18 and 24 have the same set of binary digits: 10010 and 11000, same smallest prime factor 2, and same largest prime factor 3, so both 18 and 24 are in the sequence.
MAPLE
N:= 10: # to get all terms < 2^N
H:= proc(n) local F, B;
F:= numtheory:-factorset(n);
B:= sort(convert(n, base, 2));
[min(F), max(F), op(B)];
end proc:
T:= {}:
for n from 1 to 2^N-1 do
h:= H(n);
if assigned(R[h]) then T:= T union {n, R[h]}
else R[h]:= n
fi
od:
sort(convert(T, list)); # Robert Israel, Apr 01 2016
MATHEMATICA
nn = 360; TakeWhile[Union@ Flatten@ Table[Select[Complement[Range[3 n], {n}], And[Length@ Union[DigitCount[#, 2] & /@ {#, n}] == 1, Length@ Union[{First@ #, Last@ #} &@ Map[First, FactorInteger@ #] & /@ {#, n}] == 1] &] /. i_ /; MissingQ@ i -> Nothing, {n, nn}], # <= nn &] (* Michael De Vlieger, Apr 01 2016, Version 10.2 *)
CROSSREFS
Sequence in context: A334015 A162331 A092536 * A360768 A359409 A362432
KEYWORD
nonn,base
AUTHOR
Alex Ratushnyak, Jul 23 2012
STATUS
approved