|
|
A213631
|
|
Primes p such that primality of (p+p')/2+4 and of (p+p')/2-4 differ, where p'=nextprime(p+1), the next larger prime.
|
|
1
|
|
|
5, 19, 37, 43, 67, 97, 109, 223, 229, 277, 307, 313, 349, 457, 463, 613, 643, 853, 859, 877, 883, 1087, 1093, 1279, 1297, 1303, 1423, 1429, 1447, 1489, 1609, 1663, 1693, 1783, 1867, 1993
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,1
|
|
COMMENTS
|
It is easily checked that for m=(p+p')/2 (average between two consecutive primes), the numbers m +- 1 resp. m +- 2 resp. m +- 3 (as well as m +- 6) are (in each case) either both prime or both composite (for p > 7). Thus, m +- 4 provides the least counterexample to this behavior, and the primes listed here are those for which the property does not hold, i.e., one among { m-4, m+4 } is prime and the other one is composite.
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
PROG
|
(PARI) d=8; q=3; forprime(p=nextprime(q+1), q+1999, [1, -1]*isprime([q-d+p; q+d+q=p]\2) & print1(precprime(p-1)", "))
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nonn
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|
|
|