OFFSET
1,4
COMMENTS
a(3*(2*k+1)) = 0 for all k because there are some 3rd roots involved.
REFERENCES
Related works addressing "the first case" of Fermat's Theorem as studied by mathematicians at the end of the 19th century:
L. D. Dickson, History of the Theory of Numbers, Vol II, page 756, lines -5 to -1, and page 757, lines 1 to 4: Some related work of E. Wendt is described.
L. D. Dickson, History of the Theory of Numbers, Vol II, page 757, lines 14 to 24: Some related work of G. B. Mathews (in 1895) is described.
R. Nogues, Théorème de Fermat Son Histoire (in French), reprint (1992) Jacques Gabay's edition of the original of 1932, page 132, lines 1 to 13 for G. B. Mathews's work, cited in the second Dickson reference above.
FORMULA
a(n) = Product_{u^n=1, u != 1} ((1+u)^n + 1).
PROG
(PARI) a(n)=sum(k=1, n-1, (1+exp(2*Pi*I/n))^n+1) \\ Charles R Greathouse IV, May 13 2011
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
STATUS
approved