User:Charles R Greathouse IV/Junk
- Scholarly Open Access: Jeffrey Beall's page collecting lists of predatory open access publishers and standalone journals. This was generally considered the standard resource until Jeffrey took down the website (probably due to legal threats or action). A mirror, with some attempt to update after the closing of the site, can be found at beallslist.weebly.com.
- Stop Predatory Journals: A full attempt to replace Beall's site, with regular (?) updates.
- Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association: Gold OA advocacy organization and trade association.
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): An organization promulgating best practice standards in publication ethics.
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- GVSU Open Access Journal Quality Indicators: A list of criteria for quality in open access journals. The positive indicators are relatively easy to meet, even for journals generally considered junk/predatory, making this a conservative source.
- Think Check Submit
- Margaret Ray, An expanded approach to evaluating open access journals, Journal of Scholarly Publishing 47:4 (2016), pp. 307-327.
- Peter G. Beninger, Jeffrey Beall, and Sandra E. Shumway, Debasing the currency of science: The growing menace of predatory open access journals. Journal of Shellfish Research 35:1 (2016), pp. 1-5.
- Carl Straumsheim, 'Predatory' publishing up, Inside Higher Ed (2105).
- Beryl Lieff Benderly, Avoiding fake journals and judging the work in real ones, Science blog entry (Oct. 13, 2015).
- Monica Berger and Jill Cirasella, Beyond Beall's list: better understanding predatory publishers, College & Research Libraries News 76:3 (2015), pp. 132-135.
- Robert E. Bartholomew, Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 107:10 (2014), pp. 384-385.
- Richard Van Noorden, Open-access website gets tough, Nature 512:7512 (2014), p. 17.
- Walt Crawford, Journals, 'journals' and wannabes: investigating the list, Cites & Insights 14:7 (July 2014), pp. 1-45.
- Sarah Beaubien and Max Eckard, Addressing faculty publishing concerns with open access journal quality indicators, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 2:2 (2014), 12 pp.
- Nicholas J.L. Brown, Alan D. Sokal, and Harris L. Friedman, The complex dynamics of wishful thinking: The critical positivity ratio, American Psychologist 68 (2013), pp. 801-813.
- Karen Coyle, Predatory Publishers – Peer to Peer Review, Library Journal (April 4, 2013).
- Declan Butler, Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing, Nature 495:7442 (2013), pp. 433-435.
- Mehrdad Jalalian and Hamidreza Mahboobi New corruption detected: Bogus impact factors compiled by fake organizations, Electronic Physician 5:3 (2013), pp. 685-686.
- John Bohannon, Who's afraid of peer review?, Science 342:6154 (2013), pp. 60-65.
- Alan D. Sokal, What the social text affair does and does not prove (1997).
- Alan D. Sokal, A physicist experiments with cultural studies, Lingua Franca (1996).
- Paul Boghossian, What the Sokal Hoax ought to teach us, Times Literary Supplement (1996).
- Fake conferences and junk journals, BEWARE!: Joerg Arndt's page discussing fake conferences and journals. Focuses on spam for fake conferences and their associated journals.
- What percentage of open-access journals charge publication fees?
- Wikipedia articles: Predatory open access publishing, Who's Afraid of Peer Review?, Sokal affair, Bogdanov affair
- Other hoax papers: Gary Lewis 2018
- Jeffrey Shallit blog entries: