OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
Granville and Pomerance separated the Carmichael numbers into two classes, primitive and imprimitive, according to whether g(m) <= sqrt(lambda(n)) or not.
They conjectured that most Carmichael numbers are primitive and most 3-Carmichael numbers (A087788) are imprimitive.
Comment from Jeppe Stig Nielsen, Apr 21 2021: (Start)
In cases n = 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14, 15, 19, 20, ..., there exists a primitive Carmichael number in the same "family" (Carmichael numbers that share the ratio (p_1-1):(p_2-1):...:(p_k-1) belong to the same family). However, in the remaining cases, the entire family consists of imprimitive Carmichael numbers.
There can be more than one primitive Carmichael number in a family. For example, both Carmichael numbers 5828853661 and 965507554621 are primitive, and are in the family 1:3:6:70. The first imprimitive Carmichael number in the family 1:3:6:70 is a(1639)=59610715093021. (End)
LINKS
Amiram Eldar, Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..10000
Andrew Granville and Carl Pomerance, Two contradictory conjectures concerning Carmichael numbers, Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 71, No. 238 (2002), pp. 883-908.
MATHEMATICA
aQ[n_] := Length[(f = FactorInteger[n])] > 2 && Max[f[[;; , 2]]] == 1 && Divisible[n-1, (lambda = LCM @@ (f[[;; , 1]] - 1))] && GCD @@ (f[[;; , 1]] - 1) > Sqrt[lambda]; Select[Range[4*10^6], aQ]
PROG
(PARI) isA328935(m)=f=factor(m); !(issquarefree(f)&&omega(f)>2)&&return(0); p=f[, 1]~; r=apply(x->x-1, p); foreach(r, x, (m-1)%x!=0&&return(0)); g=gcd(r); a=r/g; g>lcm(a) \\ p, g, and a are like in Granville & Pomerance, Jeppe Stig Nielsen, Apr 21 2021
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Amiram Eldar, Oct 31 2019
STATUS
approved