login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A305875
a(n) is the maximum number m such that 2n = prime(i+k) + prime(j-k), k=1,2,...,m, where i and j are a pair of numbers such that 2n = prime(i+1) + prime(j+1).
0
1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 4, 1, 1, 5, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 6, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 3, 2, 2, 5, 1, 1, 6, 1, 1, 4, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 1, 1, 4, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 4, 1, 1, 2, 1
OFFSET
2,4
COMMENTS
Conjecture: there are only 392 n's such that a(n) = 1.
EXAMPLE
For n=2, 2n=4 = 2+2, this is the only case, so a(2)=1;
For n=3, 2n=6 = 3+3, this is the only case, so a(3)=1;
...
For n=12, 2n=24 = 5+19 = 7+17 = 11+13, both {3,5,7} and {19,17,13} are consecutive prime lists with length 3, so a(12)=3;
...
For n=33, 2n=66 = 5+61 = 7+59 = 13+53 = 19+47 = 23+43 = 29+37, both {5,7} and {61, 59} are consecutive prime lists with length 2, and although {19,23,29} is a consecutive prime list with length 3, its counterpart {47,43,37} is not a consecutive prime list, so a(33)=2 but not 3.
MATHEMATICA
Table[maxct = 0; ct = 0; strike = 0; p = 1; pbuf = 1;
While[p = NextPrime[p]; (2*p) <= i,
If[PrimeQ[i - p],
If[strike == 0, ct = 1; pbuf = i - p; strike = 1,
If[pbuf == NextPrime[i - p], ct++; pbuf = i - p, strike = 0;
If[maxct < ct, maxct = ct]]], strike = 0;
If[maxct < ct, maxct = ct]]];
If[maxct < ct, maxct = ct]; maxct, {i, 4, 176, 2}]
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn,easy
AUTHOR
Lei Zhou, Jun 12 2018
STATUS
approved