|
|
A297285
|
|
Numbers whose base-15 digits have greater down-variation than up-variation; see Comments.
|
|
4
|
|
|
15, 30, 31, 45, 46, 47, 60, 61, 62, 63, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 165
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,1
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Suppose that n has base-b digits b(m), b(m-1), ..., b(0). The base-b down-variation of n is the sum DV(n,b) of all d(i)-d(i-1) for which d(i) > d(i-1); the base-b up-variation of n is the sum UV(n,b) of all d(k-1)-d(k) for which d(k) < d(k-1). The total base-b variation of n is the sum TV(n,b) = DV(n,b) + UV(n,b). See the guide at A297330.
Differs from A296758 first for 255 = 120_15, which has the same number of rises and falls and is not in A296758, but DV(255,15) =2 > UV(255,15) =1 and is in this sequence. - R. J. Mathar, Jan 23 2018
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
165 in base-15: 11,0 having DV = 11, UV = 0, so that 165 is in the sequence.
|
|
MATHEMATICA
|
g[n_, b_] := Map[Total, GatherBy[Differences[IntegerDigits[n, b]], Sign]];
x[n_, b_] := Select[g[n, b], # < 0 &]; y[n_, b_] := Select[g[n, b], # > 0 &];
b = 15; z = 2000; p = Table[x[n, b], {n, 1, z}]; q = Table[y[n, b], {n, 1, z}];
w = Sign[Flatten[p /. {} -> {0}] + Flatten[q /. {} -> {0}]];
Take[Flatten[Position[w, -1]], 120] (* A297285 *)
Take[Flatten[Position[w, 0]], 120] (* A297286 *)
Take[Flatten[Position[w, 1]], 120] (* A297287 *)
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nonn,base,easy
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|
|
|