login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A297276
Numbers whose base-12 digits have greater down-variation than up-variation; see Comments.
4
12, 24, 25, 36, 37, 38, 48, 49, 50, 51, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 132, 133, 134
OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
Suppose that n has base-b digits b(m), b(m-1), ..., b(0). The base-b down-variation of n is the sum DV(n,b) of all d(i)-d(i-1) for which d(i) > d(i-1); the base-b up-variation of n is the sum UV(n,b) of all d(k-1)-d(k) for which d(k) < d(k-1). The total base-b variation of n is the sum TV(n,b) = DV(n,b) + UV(n,b). See the guide at A297330.
Differs from A296749 first at 168 = 120_12, which is in not in A296749 because it has the same number of rises and falls, but in here because DV(168,12) =2 > UV(168,12) =1. - R. J. Mathar, Jan 23 2018
LINKS
EXAMPLE
134 in base-12: 11,2, having DV = 9, UV = 0, so that 134 is in the sequence.
MATHEMATICA
g[n_, b_] := Map[Total, GatherBy[Differences[IntegerDigits[n, b]], Sign]];
x[n_, b_] := Select[g[n, b], # < 0 &]; y[n_, b_] := Select[g[n, b], # > 0 &];
b = 12; z = 2000; p = Table[x[n, b], {n, 1, z}]; q = Table[y[n, b], {n, 1, z}];
w = Sign[Flatten[p /. {} -> {0}] + Flatten[q /. {} -> {0}]];
Take[Flatten[Position[w, -1]], 120] (* A297276 *)
Take[Flatten[Position[w, 0]], 120] (* A297277 *)
Take[Flatten[Position[w, 1]], 120] (* A297278 *)
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn,base,easy
AUTHOR
Clark Kimberling, Jan 16 2018
STATUS
approved