Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).
%I #45 Feb 27 2020 20:52:22
%S 4,6,8,10,10,10,7,19,18,16,19,17,16,11,20,19,21,22,21,19,30,21,22,23,
%T 30,22,30,30,30,7,24,27,23,28,24,29,45,25,29,20,53,28,50,45,50,30,24,
%U 25,48,25,45,40,45,26,53,48,53,45,50,45,10,27,26,32,24,26
%N a(n) = number of primes p whose balanced ternary representation is compatible with the binary representation of A276194(n).
%C Let B = binary representation of A276194(n), and let C = C(p) = balanced ternary (bt) representation of a prime p (see A117966). Thus C is a string of 0's, 1's, and -1's. We will write T instead of -1.
%C We say that C is compatible with B if (i) length(C) = length(B); (ii) C has a 1 or T wherever B has a 1; and (iii) there is exactly one 1 or T in C in the positions where B is 0, and otherwise C has a 0 whenever B has a 0.
%C Then a(n) is the number of primes p for which C(p) is compatible with B.
%C It is conjectured that all a(n) > 0. This has been checked for n <= 100000. But it is possible that there is a counterexample for very large n.
%H Lei Zhou, <a href="/A276982/b276982.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..10000</a>
%e n=1, A276194(1) = 5, or 101 in binary form. Using this as mask to generate positive balanced ternary numbers that allow 1 or T on all 1 digits, but only one digits 1 or T falls on a 0 digits, the following balanced ternary numbers can be generated: 1TT=5, 1T1=7, 11T=11, 111=13. All the four numbers are primes. So a(1)=4.
%e n=2, A276194(2) = 9, or 1001 in binary form. Using this as mask to generate positive balanced ternary numbers that allow 1 or T on all 1 digits, but only one digits 1 or T falls on a 0 digits, the following balanced ternary numbers can be generated: 1T0T=17, 1T01=19, 10TT=23, 10T1=25, 101T=29, 1011=31, 110T=35, 1101=37. Among the 8 numbers, 6 of them (17, 19, 23, 29, 31, and 37) are primes. So a(2)=6.
%t BNDigits[m_Integer] := Module[{n = m, d, t = {}},
%t While[n > 0, d = Mod[n, 2]; PrependTo[t, d]; n = (n - d)/2]; t];
%t c = 1;
%t Table[ While[c = c + 2; d = BNDigits[c]; ld = Length[d];
%t c1 = Total[d]; !(EvenQ[c1] && (c1 < ld))];
%t l = Length[d]; flps = Flatten[Position[Reverse[d], 1]] - 1;
%t flps = Delete[flps, Length[flps]];
%t sfts = Flatten[Position[Reverse[d], 0]] - 1; lf = Length[flps]; ls = Length[sfts]; ct = 0;
%t Do[Do[cp10 = 3^(l - 1) + 3^(sfts[[i]]);
%t cp20 = 3^(l - 1) - 3^(sfts[[i]]); di = BNDigits[j];
%t While[Length[di] < lf, PrependTo[di, 0]]; Do[
%t If[di[[k]] == 0, cp10 = cp10 - 3^flps[[k]];
%t cp20 = cp20 - 3^flps[[k]], cp10 = cp10 + 3^flps[[k]];
%t cp20 = cp20 + 3^flps[[k]]], {k, 1, lf}];
%t If[PrimeQ[cp10], ct++]; If[PrimeQ[cp20], ct++], {j, 0, 2^lf - 1}], {i, 1, ls}]; ct, {n, 1, 66}]
%Y Cf. A276194.
%K nonn,base
%O 1,1
%A _Lei Zhou_, Oct 20 2016
%E Edited by _N. J. A. Sloane_, Nov 05 2016