login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Paradigm shift sequence with procedure length p=5.
10

%I #13 Oct 14 2015 12:37:48

%S 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,16,20,25,30,36,42,49,56,64,72,81,100,125,

%T 150,180,216,252,294,343,392,448,512,625,750,900,1080,1296,1512,1764,

%U 2058,2401,2744,3136,3750,4500,5400,6480,7776,9072,10584,12348,14406

%N Paradigm shift sequence with procedure length p=5.

%C This sequence is the solution to the following problem: "Suppose you have the choice of using one of three production options: apply a simple action, bundle all existing actions (which requires p=5 steps), or apply the current bundled action. The first use of a novel bundle erases (or makes obsolete) all prior actions. How many total actions (simple) can be applied in n time steps?"

%C 1. This problem is structurally similar to the Copy and Paste Keyboard problem: Existing sequences (A178715 and A193286) should be regarded as Paradigm-Shift Sequences with Procedural Lengths p=1 and 2, respectively.

%C 2. The optimal number of pastes per copy, as measured by the geometric growth rate (p+z root of z), is z = 6. [Non-integer maximum between 6 and 7.]

%C 3. The function a(n) = maximum value of the product of the terms k_i, where Sum (k_i) = n+ 5 - 5*i_max

%C 4. All solutions will be of the form a(n) = m^b * (m+1)^d

%H Jonathan T. Rowell, <a href="https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL18/Rowell/rowell3.html">Solution Sequences for the Keyboard Problem and its Generalizations</a>, Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 18 (2015), Article 15.10.7.

%F a(n) =

%F a(13) = 16 [C=2 below]

%F a(24) = 100 [C=3 below]

%F a(46) = 3750 [C=5 below]

%F a(57) = 22500 [C=6 below]

%F a(68) = 135000 [C=7 below]

%F a(1:68) = m^(C-R) * (m+1)^R

%F where C = floor((n+8)/11) [min C=1]

%F m = floor ((n+5)/C)-5, and R = n+5 mod C

%F a(n>=69) = 5^b * 6^(C-b-d) * 7^d

%F where C = floor((n+8)/11)

%F R = n+8 mod 11

%F b = max(0, 3-R); d = max(0, R-3)

%F Recursive: for n>=80, a(n)=6*a(n-11)

%e For n=30, C=floor(38/11)=3, m=floor(35/3)-5 = 11-5 = 6, and R= (35 mod 3) = 2; therefore a(30) = 6^(3-2)*7^2 = 6*7^2 =294.

%e For n=13, use the general formula with C=2 (rather than C=1), with R = (18 mod 2) = 0, m=floor(18/2)-5=9-5=4; therefore a(13)=4^2*5^0=16.

%e For n=80, C = floor(88/11)=8, R=(88 mod 11) = 0, b = max(0,3)=3, and d=max(0,-3)=0; therefore a(80) = 5^3*6^(8-3)*7^0 = 5^3*6^5 = 972000

%Y A000792 (n>=1), A178715, A193286, A193455, A193456, and A193457 are paradigm shift sequences for p=0,1,...5 respectively.

%K nonn

%O 1,2

%A _Jonathan T. Rowell_, Jul 27 2011