OFFSET
1,2
COMMENTS
For n odd, one in about 7.82 of all walks have this property, while for n even it fluctuates more initially but converges to the same limit as n odd. This small constant ratio demonstrates the weakness of this test for proving with confidence better than 87.2% that an ostensibly increasing sequence is not just a purely random walk.
PROG
(C)
#include <math.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define MAX 10
int n, w[4*MAX+1];
double
f(int i, int wk, int lh, int rh)
{
w[i] = wk;
return
i < n? f(i+1, wk-1, lh+wk, 0) + f(i+1, wk+1, lh+wk, 0): // init lh
i < 2*n? f(i+1, wk-1, lh, rh+wk) + f(i+1, wk+1, lh, rh+wk): // init rh
i < 4*n? (lh >= rh? 0:
f(i+1, wk-1, lh+w[i-n]-w[i-2*n], rh+wk-w[i-n]) + // walk
f(i+1, wk+1, lh+w[i-n]-w[i-2*n], rh+wk-w[i-n])):
lh < rh; // stop
}
int
main()
{
for (n = 1; n <= MAX; n++)
printf("%2d %0.f\n", n, f(0, 0, 0, 0)/2);
return 0;
}
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
hard,more,nonn,walk
AUTHOR
Vaughan Pratt (pratt(AT)cs.stanford.edu), Sep 18 2010
STATUS
approved
