login
A389610
Same as A389609, except only consider prime divisors, instead of all divisors.
3
2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 14, 17, 19, 26, 43, 62, 64, 77, 120, 122, 153, 155, 162, 173, 175, 178, 183, 185, 246, 249, 266, 271, 302, 304, 307, 480, 485, 492, 494, 583, 586, 647, 652, 689, 691, 694, 735, 738, 821, 823, 830, 849, 1120, 1122, 1273, 1275, 1294, 1601, 1603, 1606, 1611, 1616, 1713, 1715, 1718, 1759, 1761, 1774, 1793, 1804
OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
Let D(k) = list of the distinct prime divisors of k in increasing order, and let C = [D(a(1)), D(a(2)), D(a(3)), ...]. The sequence is the lexicographically earliest sequence of integers > 1 which is equal to the partial sums of C.
We start with 2, since 1 has no prime divisors. If a(1)=2, a(2)=3 does not work. If a(1)=2 and a(2)=4, a(3)=5 does not work, but a(1)=2, a(2)=4, a(3)=6 gives C = [2, 2, 2, 3,...] with partial sums [2, 4, 6, 9, ...], and we can take a(4) = 9, and from this point on the sequence is uniquely determined by its existing terms.
Inspired by A389395, which is a similar sequence based on proper divisors.
LINKS
CROSSREFS
Sequence in context: A183422 A025057 A189753 * A278450 A030763 A387073
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
N. J. A. Sloane, Oct 12 2025.
STATUS
approved