login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

a(1)=2, a(2)=3, and for n >= 3, a(n) is calculated by considering in ascending order all products P of (distinct) terms from {a(1..n-1)} until finding one where P-1 has a prime factor not in {a(1..n-1)}, in which case a(n) is the smallest such prime factor.
1

%I #12 Feb 13 2023 08:48:25

%S 2,3,5,7,13,29,17,11,19,37,41,23,73,43,47,31,61,101,109,113,59,137,71,

%T 173,181,97,193,67,53,79,157,107,229,127,257,281,149,151,103,313,317,

%U 163,167,83,353,89,373,389,197,131,199,397,401,409,139,277,433,223

%N a(1)=2, a(2)=3, and for n >= 3, a(n) is calculated by considering in ascending order all products P of (distinct) terms from {a(1..n-1)} until finding one where P-1 has a prime factor not in {a(1..n-1)}, in which case a(n) is the smallest such prime factor.

%C A new prime is always found since at worst P can be the product of all primes {a(1..n-1)} and then P-1 certainly has a prime factor not among a(1..n-1).

%C Taking products P in ascending order generally results in smaller quantities to consider than always taking the product of all primes as done in A084598.

%C Conjecture: P-1 has at most one prime factor not already in the sequence, so the requirement of taking "the smallest such" is unnecessary (verified up to n=10000).

%H Joel Brennan, <a href="/A359505/b359505.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..5000</a>

%e For n=3, the primes so far are 2 and 3 but products P=2 or P=3 have P-1 = 1 or 2 which have no new prime factor. Product P = 2*3 = 6 has P-1 = 5 which is a new prime so a(3) = 5.

%e For n=4, the smallest product P with a new prime in P-1 is P = 3*5 = 15 for which P-1 = 14 and a(4) = 7 is its smallest new prime factor.

%Y Cf. A000945, A000946, A359504

%K nonn

%O 1,1

%A _Joel Brennan_, Jan 24 2023