login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Unique fixed point of the morphism 0 -> 01, 1 -> 20, 2 -> 0.
5

%I #44 Oct 04 2019 09:12:32

%S 0,1,2,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,2,0,0,1,2,0,0,1,2,0,0,0,1,0,1,2,0,0,0,1,0,1,2,

%T 0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,2,0,0,1,2,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,2,0,0,1,2,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,

%U 2,0,0,1,2,0,0,1,2,0,0,0,1,0,1,2,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,2,0,0,1,2,0,0,1

%N Unique fixed point of the morphism 0 -> 01, 1 -> 20, 2 -> 0.

%C From _Clark Kimberling_, May 21 2017: (Start)

%C Let u be the sequence of positions of 0, and likewise, v for 1 and w for 2. Let U, V, W be the limits of u(n)/n, v(n)/n, w(n)/n, respectively. Then 1/U + 1/V + 1/W = 1, where

%C U = 1.8392867552141611325518525646532866...,

%C V = U^2 = 3.3829757679062374941227085364...,

%C W = U^3 = 6.2222625231203986266745611011....

%C If n >=2, then u(n) - u(n-1) is in {1,2,3}, v(n) - v(n-1) is in {2,4,5}, and w(n) - w(n-1) is in {4,7,9}. (u = A277736, v = A277737, w = A277738). (End)

%C Although I believe the assertions in Kimberling's comment above to be correct, these results are quite tricky to prove, and unless a formal proof is supplied at present these assertions must be regarded as conjectures. - _N. J. A. Sloane_, Aug 20 2018

%C From _Michel Dekking_, Oct 03 2019: (Start)

%C Here is a proof of Clark Kimberling's conjectures (and more).

%C The incidence matrix of the defining morphism

%C sigma: 0 -> 01, 1 -> 20, 2 -> 0

%C is the same as the incidence matrix of the tribonacci morphism

%C 0 -> 01, 1 -> 02, 2 -> 0

%C (see A080843 and/or A092782).

%C This implies that the frequencies f0, f1 and f2 of the letters 0,1, and 2 in (a(n)) are the same as the corresponding frequencies in the tribonacci word, which are 1/t, 1/t^2 and 1/t^3 (see, e.g., A092782).

%C Since U = 1/f0, V = 1/f1, and W = 1/f2, we conclude that

%C U = t = A058265, V = t^2 = A276800 and W = t^3 = A276801.

%C The statements on the difference sequences u, v, and w of the positions of 0,1, and 2 are easily verified by applying sigma to the return words of these three letters.

%C Here the return words of an arbitrary word w in a sequence x are all the words occurring in x with prefix w that do not have other occurrences of w in them.

%C The return words of 0 are 0, 01, and 012, which indeed have length 1, 2

%C and 3. Since

%C sigma(0) = 01, sigma(1) = 0120, and sigma(012) = 01200,

%C one sees that u is the unique fixed point of the morphism

%C 1 -> 2, 2-> 31, 3 ->311.

%C With a little more work, passing to sigma^2, and rotating, one can show that v is the unique fixed point of the morphism

%C 2->52, 4->5224, 5->52244 .

%C Similarly, w is the unique fixed point of the morphism

%C 4->94, 7->9447, 9->94477.

%C Interestingly, the three morphisms having u,v, and w as fixed point are essentially the same morphism (were we replaced sigma by sigma^2) with standard form

%C 1->12, 2->1223, 3->12233.

%C (End)

%C The kind of phenomenon observed at the end of the previous comment holds in a very strong way for the tribonacci word. See Theorem 5.1. in the paper by Huang and Wen. - _Michel Dekking_, Oct 04 2019

%H N. J. A. Sloane, <a href="/A277735/b277735.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..20000</a>

%H Y.-K. Huang, Z.-Y. Wen, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0252-9602(15)30086-2">Kernel words and gap sequence of the Tribonacci sequence</a>, Acta Mathematica Scientia (Series B). 36.1 (2016) 173-194.

%H Victor F. Sirvent, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00121-9">Semigroups and the self-similar structure of the flipped tribonacci substitution</a>, Applied Math. Letters, 12 (1999), 25-29.

%H Victor F. Sirvent, <a href="https://doi.org/10.36045/bbms/1103055617">The common dynamics of the Tribonacci substitutions</a>, Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society-Simon Stevin 7.4 (2000): 571-582.

%H <a href="/index/Fi#FIXEDPOINTS">Index entries for sequences that are fixed points of mappings</a>

%p with(ListTools);

%p T:=proc(S) Flatten(subs( {0=[0,1], 1=[2,0], 2=[0]}, S)); end;

%p S:=[0];

%p for n from 1 to 10 do S:=T(S); od:

%p S;

%t s = Nest[Flatten[# /. {0 -> {0, 1}, 1 -> {2, 0}, 2 -> 0}] &, {0}, 10] (* A277735 *)

%t Flatten[Position[s, 0]] (* A277736 *)

%t Flatten[Position[s, 1]] (* A277737 *)

%t Flatten[Position[s, 2]] (* A277738 *)

%t (* _Clark Kimberling_, May 21 2017 *)

%Y Cf. A277736, A277737, A277738.

%Y Equals A100619(n)-1.

%K nonn

%O 1,3

%A _N. J. A. Sloane_, Nov 07 2016

%E Name clarified by _Michel Dekking_, Oct 03 2019