|
%I #9 Aug 23 2016 12:06:08
%S 0,3,1,4,2,9,12,10,5,14,6,19,7,20,8,25,28,26,11,30,33,13,37,39,15,42,
%T 16,41,17,48,18,49,53,55,21,58,22,57,23,63,24,66,68,70,27,74,76,29,79,
%U 77,31,84,32,85,89,34,90,35,94,36,98,100,38,103,101,40,107,110,112,43,115,44,119,45,116,46
%N a(n) = A065189(n+1)-1.
%C All of A065188, A065189, A199134, A275884 should really have started at 0 rather than 1. Then the graph of A065188, for example, would be comparable with the graph of A002251.
%H N. J. A. Sloane, <a href="/A275896/b275896.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 0..9999</a>
%Y Cf. A065188, A065189, A199134, A275884, A275894, A275895, A002251.
%K nonn
%O 0,2
%A _N. J. A. Sloane_, Aug 23 2016
|
