Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).
%I #38 Aug 01 2019 04:09:52
%S 0,0,0,4,0,42,0,116,162,730,0,2458,0,11494,16890,32628,0,180960,0,
%T 554994,931476,2800534,0,11005898,6643750,43946838,44738892,136580910,
%U 0,720879712,0,2147450740,3250382916,10923409738,11517062060,45683761528,0,172783692982
%N a(n) = 2^n - Sum_{m=0..n} binomial(n/gcd(n,m), m/gcd(n,m)) = 2^n - A082906.
%C Compared to A082906, this sequence shows better the drop from 2^n upon replacing every binomial(n,m) in the Newton's expansion of (1+1)^n by the 'reduced' binomial(n/gcd(n,m), m/gcd(n,m)). For n > 1, a(n) is zero if and only if n is prime (no reduction, no drop). The ratio r(n) = a(n)/2^n is always smaller than 1 and presents considerable excursions. For composite n up to 5000, the minimum of 0.01471... occurs for n = 4489, and the maximum of 0.80849... occurs for n = 2310. This apparently large relative difference is actually surprisingly small: on log_2 scale it amounts to just about 5.78; a tiny fraction compared to the full scale, given by the values of n for the extrema. This insight suggests the following conjecture: there exists an average ratio r, defined as r = lim_{n->infinity} Sum_{m=1..n} r(m)/n. Its value appears to be approximately 0.3915+-0.0010, which can be interpreted as the average drop in a binomial value upon the 'reduction' of its arguments.
%H Stanislav Sykora, <a href="/A271834/b271834.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..1000</a>
%H Stanislav Sykora, <a href="/A271834/a271834.txt">Ratios A271834(n)/2^n for n=1..5000</a>
%F For prime p, a(p) = 0.
%F For any n, a(n) < 2^n - n(n+1)/2.
%e Sum_{m=1..2500} r(m)/2500 = 0.391460...
%e Sum_{m=2501..5000} r(m)/2500 = 0.391975...
%e Sum_{m=1..5000} r(m)/5000 = 0.391718...
%p A271834:=n->2^n-add(binomial(n/gcd(n,m),m/gcd(n,m)),m=0..n): seq(A271834(n), n=1..50); # _Wesley Ivan Hurt_, Apr 19 2016
%t Table[2^n - Sum[Binomial[n/GCD[n, m], m/GCD[n, m]], {m, 0, n}], {n, 40}] (* _Wesley Ivan Hurt_, Apr 19 2016 *)
%o (PARI) bcg(n,m)=binomial(n/gcd(n,m),m/gcd(n,m));
%o a = vector(1000,n,2^n-vecsum(vector(n+1,m,bcg(n,m-1))))
%Y Cf. A082905, A082906.
%K nonn,easy
%O 1,4
%A _Stanislav Sykora_, Apr 19 2016