Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).
%I #102 May 20 2024 16:48:06
%S 4,5,9,20,49,125,324,845,2209,5780,15129,39605,103684,271445,710649,
%T 1860500,4870849,12752045,33385284,87403805,228826129,599074580,
%U 1568397609,4106118245,10749957124,28143753125,73681302249,192900153620,505019158609
%N a(n) = 2 + L(2*n) = 2 + A005248(n), n >= 0, with the Lucas numbers (A000032).
%C This sequence also gives the curvature of touching circles inscribed in a special way in the smaller segment of a circle of radius 5/4 cut by a chord of length 2.
%C Consider a circle C of radius 5/4 (in some length units) with a chord of length 2. This has been chosen so that the larger sagitta also has length 2. The smaller sagitta has length 1/2. The input, besides the circle C, is the circle C_0 with radius R_0 = 1/4, touching the chord and circle C. The following sequence of circles C_n with radii R_n, n >= 1, is obtained from the conditions that C_n touches (i) the circle C, (ii) the chord and (iii) the circle C_(n-1). The curvature of the n-th circle, C_n = 1/R_n, n >= 0, is conjectured to be a(n). See an illustration given in the link. As found by _Wolfdieter Lang_ (see part II of the proof given by W. Lang in the link), this circle problem is related to the nonnegative solutions of the Pell equation X^2 - 5*Y^2 = 4: a(n) = 2 + X(n) = 2 + A005248(n). For the larger segment below the chord (with sagitta length 2) the sequence would be A115032, see W. Lang's proof given in part I of the link.
%C If the circle radius and the sagitta length were both equal to 1, the curvature sequence would be A099938.
%C Essentially a duplicate of A092387. - _R. J. Mathar_, Jul 07 2023
%H G. C. Greubel, <a href="/A240926/b240926.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 0..2375</a>
%H Wolfdieter Lang, <a href="/A240926/a240926_8.pdf"> Proof of the coincidence of a(n) with the touching circle problem (part II)</a>.
%H Wolfdieter Lang, <a href="/A240926/a240926_10.pdf">Figures for various touching circle problems</a>.
%H Kival Ngaokrajang, <a href="/A240926/a240926_5.pdf">Illustration of initial terms</a>.
%H <a href="/index/Ch#Cheby">Index entries for sequences related to Chebyshev polynomials.</a>
%H <a href="/index/Rec#order_03">Index entries for linear recurrences with constant coefficients</a>, signature (4,-4,1).
%F Conjectures (proved in the next entry) from _Colin Barker_, Aug 25 2014 (and Aug 27 2014): (Start)
%F a(n) = (2 + ((1/2)*(3-sqrt(5)))^n + ((1/2)*(3+sqrt(5)))^n).
%F a(n) = 4*a(n-1) - 4*a(n-2) + a(n-3).
%F G.f.: -(5*x^2-11*x+4) / ((x-1)*(x^2-3*x+1)). (End)
%F From _Wolfdieter Lang_, Aug 26 2014: (Start)
%F a(n) = 2 + S(n, 3) - S(n-2, 3) = 2 + 2*S(n, 3) - 3*S(n-1, 3).
%F a(n) = 3*a(n-1) - a(n-2) - 2, n >= 1, with a(-1)= 5 and a(0) = 4 (from the S(n, 3) recurrence or from A005248).
%F The first of the _Colin Barker_ conjectures above is true because of the Binet-de Moivre formula for L(2*n) (see the Jul 24 2003 _Dennis P. Walsh_ comment on A005248). With phi = (1+sqrt(5))/2, use 1/phi = phi-1, phi^2 = phi+1, (phi-1)^2 = 2 - phi.
%F His third conjecture (the g.f.) follows from the g.f. of A005248 by adding 2/(1-x).
%F His second conjecture (recurrence) with input a(-3) = 20, a(-2) = 9 and a(-1) = 5 (from the above given recurrence) leads to his g.f. with the expanded denominator. Thus all three conjectures are true. (End)
%F a(n) = A005592(n) + 3, with n > 0. - _Zino Magri_, Feb 16 2015
%F a(n) = (phi^n + phi^(-n))^2, where phi = A001622 = (1 + sqrt(5))/2. - _Diego Rattaggi_, Jun 10 2020
%F Sum_{k>=0} 1/a(k) = A338303. - _Amiram Eldar_, Oct 22 2020
%t Table[2 + LucasL[2 n], {n, 0, 50}] (* _Vincenzo Librandi_, Oct 08 2015 *)
%o (Magma) [2+Lucas(2*n): n in [0..40]]; // _Vincenzo Librandi_, Oct 08 2015
%o (PARI) vector(100, n, n--; 2 + fibonacci(2*n-1) + fibonacci(2*n+1)) \\ _Altug Alkan_, Oct 08 2015
%Y Cf. A000032, A005248, A005592, A099938, A115032, A246638, A246639, A246640, A246641, A246642, A338303.
%K nonn,easy
%O 0,1
%A _Kival Ngaokrajang_, Aug 03 2014
%E Edited: name changed (after proof has been given in part II of the W. Lang link), comments rewritten, cross refs. and link to Chebyshev index added. - _Wolfdieter Lang_, Aug 26 2014