login
A problem of Zarankiewicz: maximal number of 1's in an n X n matrix of 0's and 1's with 0's on the main diagonal and no "rectangle" with 1's at the four corners.
8

%I #31 Feb 07 2022 09:01:40

%S 0,2,6,9,12,16,21,24,29,34,39,45

%N A problem of Zarankiewicz: maximal number of 1's in an n X n matrix of 0's and 1's with 0's on the main diagonal and no "rectangle" with 1's at the four corners.

%C In other words, the pattern

%C 1...1

%C .....

%C 1...1

%C is forbidden.

%C From _Don Knuth_, Aug 13 2014: (Start)

%C Well, it is well known from A001197 that a(8)<25. A001197 is essentially the same problem, but increased by 1, and without restricting the diagonals. The diagonal restriction is however of little interest, because it's easy to permute rows and columns and get all 0's or all 1's or probably any of the 2^n possible settings of the diagonal. At least, this is true when n=8; hence a(8) in this sequence is 24.

%C Transposing cols 1<->4 and 5<->8 in the example by Guy 1967 page 130 as cited in A001197 gives a(8)=24:

%C 01110000

%C 10010100

%C 00010011

%C 01000101

%C 10100010

%C 11001000

%C 00101001

%C 00001110

%C But as stated above, I think this is quite trivial, and I believe this sequence should be downplayed. Readers should look at the sequence A001197 --- that's what Zarankiewicz's problem asked for in 1951, namely the min number that forces a rectangle, not the max number that doesn't exclude it.

%C (end)

%C Conjecture: for n >= 3, a(n) = A072567(n) = A001197(n) - 1 (per above comment). - _Max Alekseyev_, Jan 29 2022

%D B. Bollobas, Extremal Graph Theory, pp. 309ff.

%H D. Bienstock and E. Gyori, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0404002">An extremal problem on sparse 0-1 matrices</a>, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 4 (1991), 17-27.

%Y Cf. A072567, A191874, A191965, A191966.

%K nonn,more

%O 1,2

%A _R. H. Hardin_ and _N. J. A. Sloane_, Jun 18 2011

%E a(8) confirmed, a(9)-a(12) added by _Max Alekseyev_, Feb 07 2022