login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Lesser of the smallest pair of consecutive positive reduced quadratic residues modulo p = prime(n) > 5.
1

%I #13 Feb 11 2024 13:27:49

%S 1,3,3,1,4,1,4,1,3,1,9,1,6,3,3,9,1,1,1,3,1,1,4,1,3,3,1,1,3,1,4,4,1,3,

%T 9,1,9,3,3,1,1,6,1,4,1,3,3,1,1,1,3,1,1,4,1,3,1,6,9,6,1,1,6,4,1,3,3,1,

%U 1,1,3,4,1,4,3,1,1,3,3,1,1,1,3,1,1,4,1,3,1,1,3,4,1,4,1,6,3,9,6,3,1,4,1,3,1

%N Lesser of the smallest pair of consecutive positive reduced quadratic residues modulo p = prime(n) > 5.

%C For all n, a(n) exists and equals 1, 3, 4, 6 or 9. Proof: a(4)=1 by inspection. For n > 4 (p > 7), if 2 is a quadratic residue of p, then a(n)=1; otherwise if 5 is a quadratic residue of p, then a(n)=4 or 3; otherwise 2*5=10 is a quadratic residue of p and (9, 10) are consecutive residues. However, a(n)=8 or 7 is impossible as 8 cannot be a quadratic residue (since 2 is not), leaving 9 and 6 as the other possible values.

%C The constant 0.133141413191633911131141331131441391... = sum(a(n)/10^(n-3)) is conjectured to be irrational.

%H Nick Hobson, <a href="/A125607/b125607.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 4..1003</a>

%H D. H. Lehmer and Emma Lehmer, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1962-0138582-6">On Runs of Residues</a>, Proc. American Mathematical Society, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Feb., 1962), pp. 102-106.

%e The quadratic residues of 13=prime(6) are 1, 3, 4, 9, 10 and 12. The least consecutive pair of residues is (3, 4); hence a(6)=3.

%o (PARI) vector(108, m, p=prime(m+3); if(p%8==1||p%8==7, 1, if(p%12==1||p%12==11, 3, if(p%10==1||p%10==9, 4, if((p%24==1||p%24==5||p%24==19||p%24==23) && (p%28==1||p%28==3||p%28==9||p%28==19||p%28==25||p%28==27), 6, 9)))))

%Y Cf. A000445, A002307, A097159, A097160, A097161.

%K easy,nonn

%O 4,2

%A _Nick Hobson_, Nov 30 2006