login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A105170
Primes that are not necessary for Goldbach's conjecture.
1
11, 17, 29, 41, 59, 67, 71, 73, 89, 97, 103, 127, 137, 149, 151, 163, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 223, 227, 229, 233, 239, 241, 257, 263, 271, 277, 311, 317, 331, 347, 349, 353, 359, 367, 373, 379, 389, 397, 409, 419, 433, 443, 461, 463, 467, 479, 487, 499, 503, 541, 547, 557, 563, 571, 577, 587, 593, 599, 607, 613, 617, 619, 631, 641, 647, 653, 659, 661, 677
OFFSET
1,1
COMMENTS
Jacques Tramu confirmed and extended these results. If all of the unnecessary primes are excluded, all even numbers up to 60000 can be obtained. Not proved, a proof of Goldbach's conjecture would be easier. It would be good to verify the unnecessary list to a million or so. So far, 3/5 of the primes are unnecessary.
LINKS
Ed Pegg Jr, Goldbach's conjecture, Material added 09 April 2005.
EXAMPLE
3 and 5 are necessary for 3+5=8. 7 is necessary for 5+7 = 12. 11 seems to be a completely unnecessary prime, so I marked it as such. 13 is then needed for 5+13 = 18 (can't use 7+11=18, since I've ruled 11 unnecessary). And so on, looking at each prime in turn and determining whether they are necessary or unnecessary.
CROSSREFS
Sequence in context: A220293 A166307 A128464 * A162175 A178128 A330410
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Ed Pegg Jr, Apr 11 2005
STATUS
approved