Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).
%I #14 Feb 16 2022 11:13:55
%S 2,3,5,7,22,33,55,77,735,23772,73332,77322,223272,232722,233772,
%T 327222,333375,333732,337575,337722,357735,372372,375375,722232,
%U 732732,735735,737772,753375,773535,777735,2223732,2323272,2332722,2333772,2723322,2727732,2732772
%N Erroneous version of A062239, numbers n with property that every digit is a prime factor of n.
%C Original definition: Numbers n such that all digits are primes and divide n.
%C Something is wrong. The definition produces A062239, not the present sequence. Either the definition or the terms are wrong. - _Harry J. Smith_, Feb 17 2010
%C The terms this sequence ought to have to be correct to its original definition are: 222, 333, 555, 777, 2222, 2232, 2322, 2772, 3222, 3333, 3555, 5355, 5535, 5555, 5775, 7777, 22222, 22332, 22722, 23232, 23322, 27272, 32232, 32322, 33222, 33333, 33555, 35355, 35535, 37737. The only explanation I can think of for their absence is that the sequence was computed by hand and these numbers were overlooked. - _Alonso del Arte_, Dec 05 2011
%e 735 is divisible by 7,3,5; 23772 is divisible by 2,3,7; ...
%K dead
%O 1,1
%A Sudipta Das (juitech(AT)vsnl.net), Jan 02 2002