login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

A052297
Number of distinct prime factors of all composite numbers between n-th and (n+1)st primes.
14
0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 4, 2, 5, 5, 3, 6, 5, 3, 5, 6, 7, 3, 7, 6, 2, 8, 4, 8, 9, 5, 3, 6, 2, 6, 14, 5, 8, 3, 11, 3, 9, 7, 6, 8, 8, 3, 13, 2, 6, 3, 14, 15, 5, 3, 7, 9, 3, 11, 8, 9, 9, 3, 9, 6, 3, 13, 16, 7, 3, 6, 16, 8, 13, 3, 6, 9, 10, 9, 9, 6, 8, 11, 6, 12, 14, 4, 14, 2, 10, 7, 8, 11, 6, 4, 6, 16, 10, 6, 13
OFFSET
1,3
COMMENTS
From Lei Zhou, Mar 18 2014: (Start)
This is also the number of primes such that the (n+1)-th prime (mod i-th prime) is smaller than the (n+1)-th prime (mod n-th prime) for 1 <= i < n.
Proof: We denote the n-th prime number as P_n. Suppose P_(n+1) mod P_i = k; we can write P_(n+1) = m*P_i + k. Setting l = P_(n+1) - P_n, the composite numbers between P_n and P_(n+1) will be consecutively m*P_i + C, where C = k-l+1, k-l+2, ..., k-1. If k < l, there must be a value at which C equals zero since k-1 > 0 and k-l+1 <= 0, so P_i is a factor of a composite number between P_n and P_(n+1). If k >= l, all C values are greater than zero, thus P_i cannot be a factor of a composite number between P_n and P_(n+1). (End)
EXAMPLE
n=30, p(30)=113, the next prime is 127. Between them are 13 composites: {114, 115, ..., 126}. Factorizing all and collecting prime factors, the set {2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,41,59,61} is obtained, consisting of 14 primes, so a(30)=14.
MATHEMATICA
Length[Union[Flatten[Table[Transpose[FactorInteger[n]][[1]], {n, First[#]+ 1, Last[#]-1}]]]]&/@Partition[Prime[Range[100]], 2, 1] (* Harvey P. Dale, Jan 19 2012 *)
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Labos Elemer, Feb 09 2000
STATUS
approved