login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Smallest abundant number (sigma(x) > 2x) which is not divisible by any of the first n primes.
22

%I #79 Sep 30 2022 09:50:43

%S 12,945,5391411025,20169691981106018776756331,

%T 49061132957714428902152118459264865645885092682687973,

%U 7970466327524571538225709545434506255970026969710012787303278390616918473506860039424701

%N Smallest abundant number (sigma(x) > 2x) which is not divisible by any of the first n primes.

%C a(n) exists for every n, since the sum of the inverses of the primes is infinite.

%C From _Fred Schneider_, Sep 20 2006; edited by _Danny Rorabaugh_, Nov 26 2018: (Start)

%C Heuristic: Add the squares of several successive primes and then add successive primes until the number is abundant.

%C a(2) = 5^2 * 7 * 11 * 13 * 17 * 19 * 23 * 29;

%C a(3) = 7^2 * 11^2 * 13 * 17 * ... * 61 * 67;

%C a(4) = 11^2 * 13^2 * 17 * 19 * ... * 131 * 137;

%C a(5) = 13^2 * 17^2 * 19 * 23 * ... * 223 * 227. (End)

%C a(6) = 17^2 * 19^2 * 23^2 * 29 * 31 * ... * 347 * 349;

%C a(7) = 19^2 * 23^2 * 29^2 * 31 * 37 * ... * 491 * 499 (both coming from the D. Iannucci paper). - _Michel Marcus_, May 01 2013

%C The known terms of this sequence provide Egyptian decompositions of unity in which all the denominators lack the first n primes, as follows: Every term listed in this sequence is a semiperfect number, which means that a subset of its divisors add up to the number itself. The decomposition 1 = 1/a + 1/b + ... + 1/m, where the denominators are a(n) divided by those divisors, is the desired decomposition. - _Javier Múgica_, Nov 15 2017

%C a(n) is the product of consecutive primes starting from prime(n+1) raised to nonincreasing powers. - _Jianing Song_, Apr 10 2021

%C From _Jianing Song_, Apr 14 2021: (Start)

%C By definition, Omega(a(n)) >= A108227(n+1) for all n, where Omega = A001222. For 0 <= n <= 12 we have Omega(a(n)) = A108227(n+1), but this is not true for n = 13, where Omega(a(13)) = 335 > A108227(14) = 334.

%C We also have omega(a(n)) >= A001276(n+1) for all n, where omega = A001221. The differences for known terms are 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, 6 respectively.

%C Conjecture: other than a(1) = 945, all terms are cubefree. (End)

%D M. T. Whalen and C. L. Miller, Odd abundant numbers: some interesting observations, Journal of Recreational Mathematics 22 (1990), pp. 257-261.

%H Jeppe Stig Nielsen, <a href="/A047802/b047802.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 0..13</a>

%H Thomas Fink, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.10398">Recursively abundant and recursively perfect numbers</a>, arXiv:2008.10398 [math.NT], 2020. Mentions this sequence.

%H Douglas Iannucci, <a href="http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bbms/1113318127">On the smallest abundant number not divisible by the first k primes</a>, Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society 12:1 (2005), pp. 39-44.

%F Iannucci shows that log a(n) = (n log n)^(2 + o(1)). - _Charles R Greathouse IV_, Feb 16 2011

%e a(0) = 12, the first abundant number; a(1) = 945, the first odd abundant number; a(5) is the first abundant number not divisible by 2,3,5,7 or 11.

%Y Subsequence of A005101 and A133812; cf. A005231.

%K nonn

%O 0,1

%A Ulrich Schimke (ulrschimke(AT)aol.com)

%E 2 more terms from _Fred Schneider_, Sep 20 2006