login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Integers in alphabetical order in U.S. English.
9

%I #33 Dec 28 2023 15:20:41

%S 8,8000000000,8000000008,8000000018,8000000080,8000000088,8000000085

%N Integers in alphabetical order in U.S. English.

%C Jasper Mulder, Jan 25 2010, comments that this sequence is ill-defined, since there are an infinite number of cardinal numbers that start with a 'd', namely all those powers of 10 named decillion, duodecillion and so on (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_numerals).

%C However, it would seem then that 'billion' and 'centillion' also precede these, while it is standard (and systematic for this sequence) to refer to such numbers as 'one billion', 'one decillion', etc. - Yasiru Ratnayake, May 03 2012

%D F. Smarandache, Sequences of Numbers Involved in Unsolved Problems, Hexis, Phoenix, 2006.

%H F. Smarandache, <a href="http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/Sequences-book.pdf">Sequences of Numbers Involved in Unsolved Problems</a>.

%e The list begins "eight", "eight billion", "eight billion eight", ... [corrected by _Paul Duckett_, Nov 26 2023]

%Y Cf. A019440, A026081. See A108067 for another version.

%Y Cf. A073327, A152611, A075831, A000052.

%K word,nonn,more

%O 1,1

%A _N. J. A. Sloane_, _Neil Fernandez_