|
|
A365509
|
|
Number of n-vertex binary trees that do not contain 0(0[0(0(00))]) as a subtree.
|
|
2
|
|
|
1, 2, 5, 14, 41, 124, 383, 1202, 3819, 12255, 39651, 129190, 423469, 1395425
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,2
|
|
COMMENTS
|
By 'binary tree' we mean a rooted, ordered tree which is either empty, denoted by 0, or it has both a left subtree L and a right subtree R (which can be empty), and then it is denoted by (LR) if it is attached by a contiguous edge to its parent, [LR] if attached by a non-contiguous edge, or LR if it is does not have a parent, i.e., if is the root. A contiguous edge in the pattern tree corresponds to a parent-child relation in the host tree (as in Rowland's paper), whereas a non-contiguous edge in the pattern tree corresponds to an ancestor-descendant relation in the host tree (as in the paper by Dairyko, Pudwell, Tyner, and Wynn).
Number of n-vertex binary trees that do not contain 0(0[((00)0)0]) as a subtree.
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
Cf. A007051 for pattern 0[0[0[0[00]]]], i.e., same tree shape, but all edges non-contiguous.
Cf. A036766 for pattern 0(0(0(0(00)))), i.e., same tree shape, but all edges contiguous.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nonn,more
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|
|
|