|
| |
|
|
A119310
|
|
Alphabetical value of n in its Roman numerals-based representation.
|
|
3
| |
|
|
9, 18, 27, 31, 22, 31, 40, 49, 33, 24, 33, 42, 51, 55, 46, 55, 64, 73, 57, 48, 57, 66, 75, 79, 70, 79, 88, 97, 81, 72, 81, 90, 99, 103, 94, 103, 112, 121, 105, 36, 45, 54, 63, 67, 58, 67, 76, 85, 69, 12, 21, 30, 39, 43, 34, 43, 52, 61, 45, 36, 45, 54, 63, 67, 58, 67, 76, 85, 69
(list; graph; refs; listen; history; internal format)
|
|
|
|
OFFSET
| 1,1
|
|
|
COMMENTS
| This uses "modern" (i.e. medieval) Roman numerals; the ancient Romans did not use prefixed letters to subtract. One sometimes sees e.g. "IL" for 49, but this is not standard; the standard representation encodes each digit separately. Sequence is finite since Roman numerals are only defined up to 3999. (There is an extension using underlined letters up to 3999999, but that's still finite.) - Frank Adams-Watters (FrankTAW(AT)Netscape.net), Jul 26 2006
|
|
|
LINKS
| Jeremy Gardiner, Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..3999
|
|
|
EXAMPLE
| a(12) corresponds to XII whose alphabetical value is 24 + 9 + 9 = 42.
|
|
|
CROSSREFS
| Cf. A002963
Sequence in context: A110529 A127887 A037337 * A037993 A044849 A114612
Adjacent sequences: A119307 A119308 A119309 * A119311 A119312 A119313
|
|
|
KEYWORD
| base,easy,fini,nonn
|
|
|
AUTHOR
| Tanya Khovanova (tanyakh(AT)yahoo.com), Jul 23 2006
|
|
|
EXTENSIONS
| More terms from Frank Adams-Watters (FrankTAW(AT)Netscape.net), Jul 26 2006
|
| |
|
|
