OFFSET
2,1
COMMENTS
It would be nice to remove the word "Conjectured" from the description. - N. J. A. Sloane
All the terms in this sequence except the first are only conjectures. (See Walker, Irvin on a(10)=196 and Brockhaus on a(2)=22.)
An obvious algorithm is: start with r := n and check whether the "reverse and add!" algorithm in base n halts in a palindrome or not. If it stops, increment r by one and repeat the process, else return r. To obtain the values above, an upper limit of 100 "reverse and add!" steps was used.
Conjectures: a(n) shows the same asymptotic behavior as n^2. For infinitely many n, a(n) = n^2 - n - 1. Again, it is an open question, if the values of the sequence really lead to infinitely many "reverse and add!" steps or not. Is the sequence always positive?
LINKS
Klaus Brockhaus, On the 'Reverse and Add!' algorithm in base 2
MATHEMATICA
limit = 10^3; (* Assumes that there is no palindrome if none is found before "limit" iterations *)
Table[SelectFirst[Range[10000],
Length@NestWhileList[ # + IntegerReverse[#, n] &, #, # !=
IntegerReverse[#, n] &, 1, limit] == limit + 1 &] , {n, 2,
47}] (* Robert Price, Oct 18 2019 *)
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn,base
AUTHOR
Frederick Magata (frederick.magata(AT)uni-muenster.de), Dec 29 2001
EXTENSIONS
David W. Wilson remarks (Jan 02 2002): I verified these using 1000 digits as a stopping point (this would be >>1000 iterations). I am highly confident of these values.
STATUS
approved