OFFSET
0,2
COMMENTS
The Carr and Carr article says: "Pryor (1954) has postulated three developmental series of bud numbers, as follows : (a) 1, 3, 7, 11, 15, 23, 35 . . . (b) 1, 3, 7, 13, 21, 31 . . . (c) 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63, 127 . . ."
It would be nice to have more information.
Is this the same as A139250? If not, where is the first place these sequences differ? - Omar E. Pol, Oct 22 2012
REFERENCES
D. J. Carr and S. G. M. Carr, Developmental morphology of the floral organs of Eucalyptus. I. The inflorescence, Australian Journal of Botany 7(2) (1959), 109-141.
A. R. Penfold and J. L. Willis, The eucalypts: botany, cultivation, chemistry, and utilization, London, L. Hill; New York, Interscience Publishers, 1961.
L. D. Pryor (1954), The inheritance of inflorescence characters in Eucalyptus. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 79: 79-89. [From Omar E. Pol, Mar 07 2010]
L. D. Pryor & J. H. Willis, Eucalyptus aromaphloia, Vict. Nat., 71: 125 (1954)
LINKS
D. J. Carr and S. G. M. Carr, Developmental morphology of the floral organs of Eucalyptus. I. The inflorescence, Austr. J. Botany 7(2) (1959), 109-141. [2.6 MB, may need longer to load]
L. D. Pryor, Illustration of initial terms (Fig. 2a)
L. D. Pryor, The Inheritance of Inflorescence Characters in Eucalyptus, Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, V. 79, (1954), p. 81-83.
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn,more
AUTHOR
N. J. A. Sloane, based on email from Omar E. Pol, Mar 07 2010
STATUS
approved