login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Positions of 0 in A285960; complement of A285962.
3

%I #10 Jul 29 2022 21:27:15

%S 4,7,12,16,20,23,27,31,36,39,44,48,52,57,60,64,68,71,76,80,84,87,91,

%T 95,100,103,107,111,114,119,123,127,132,135,140,144,148,151,155,159,

%U 164,167,172,176,180,185,188,192,196,199,204,208,212,217,220,225,229

%N Positions of 0 in A285960; complement of A285962.

%C Conjecture: lim_{n->oo} a(n)/n = 4.

%C From _Michel Dekking_, Apr 19 2022: (Start)

%C Kimberling's conjecture is equivalent to the property that the frequency of 1's in A285960 is equal to 1/4. This can be computed via the comments of A285960.

%C But more is true. The first difference sequence (d(n)) = 3,5,4,4,3,4,4,5,3,... of (a(n)) is a morphic sequence. Let

%C A=011, B=010, C=0110, and D=01.

%C From the representation of A285960 as fixed point of the derived morphism

%C tau: A -> AB, B -> CD, C -> ABD, D -> C,

%C decorated by the morphism

%C delta: A-> 11, B-> 10, C-> 110, D-> 1,

%C we do not see how to obtain the differences between occurrences of 0's. However, A285960 is also represented as fixed point of

%C tau^2: A->ABCD, B->ABDC, C->ABCDC, D->ABD, and delta, where the four images turn into

%C delta(tau^2(A))=11101101, delta(tau^2(B))=11101110,

%C delta(tau^2(C))=11101101110, delta(tau^2(D))=11101.

%C The corresponding consecutive distances between 0's are 35, 44, 344, and 5.

%C The "natural" algorithm to obtain (d(n)) as a letter-to-letter image of a morphic sequence from this decoration yields (for example) a morphism mu on a six-letter alphabet {a,b,c,d,e,f} given by

%C mu: a->ab, b->cd, c->aed, d->f, e->cd, f->aed,

%C with the letter-to-letter map

%C lambda: a->3, b->5, c->4, d->4, e->4, f->5.

%C We have (d(n)) = lambda(z), where z is the fixed point z = abcdaed... of mu.

%C Note that it turns out that mu is the same morphism as the one used to obtain A286047 and A286048 as morphic sequences.

%C Another way to prove Kimberling's conjecture: a(n)/n = (1/n)*Sum_{k=1..n} d(k), the average value M of the differences.

%C To obtain the limit, you need the frequencies M(a),...,M(f) of a,b,...,f in the fixed point of mu. These are computed with the Perron-Frobenius theorem.

%C We have M(a)=M(d)=1/4, M(b)=M(c)=M(d)=M(f)=1/8. So M = (2/8)*3 + (4/8)*4 + (2/8)*5 = (1/8)*(6+16+10) = 32/8 = 4.

%C (End)

%H Clark Kimberling, <a href="/A285961/b285961.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..10000</a>

%e As a word, A285960 = 111011011110111011..., in which 0 is in positions 4,7,12,16,...

%t s = Nest[Flatten[# /. {0 -> {0, 1}, 1 -> {1, 0}}] &, {0}, 8] (* Thue-Morse, A010060 *)

%t w = StringJoin[Map[ToString, s]]

%t w1 = StringReplace[w, {"01" -> "1"}]

%t st = ToCharacterCode[w1] - 48 (* A285960 *)

%t Flatten[Position[st, 0]] (* A285961 *)

%t Flatten[Position[st, 1]] (* A285962 *)

%Y Cf. A010060, A285960, A285962, A286047.

%K nonn,easy

%O 1,1

%A _Clark Kimberling_, May 05 2017