login
The OEIS is supported by the many generous donors to the OEIS Foundation.

 

Logo
Hints
(Greetings from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences!)
A225907 Smallest n-Ramanujan prime that is less than half of the next n-Ramanujan prime, or 0 if none exists. 4

%I #21 Feb 14 2022 11:24:20

%S 0,2,11,41,587,14143

%N Smallest n-Ramanujan prime that is less than half of the next n-Ramanujan prime, or 0 if none exists.

%C In A192824 Noe defines 0-Ramanujan primes to be simply primes, and 1-Ramanujan primes to be Ramanujan primes. Define the k-th 2-Ramanujan prime to be the smallest number R'_k (the notation in Paksoy 2012) with the property that the interval (x/2,x] contains at least k 1-Ramanujan primes, for any x >= R'_k. Continuing inductively, define n-Ramanujan primes in terms of (n-1)-Ramanujan primes.

%C Only the first three terms 0, 2, 11 are proved (by Chebyshev, Ramanujan, and Paksoy, respectively). The rest are conjectural--see the 2nd comment in A192821.

%C See A104272 for additional comments, references, links, and cross-refs.

%C Is it true that for every n there exists K = K(n) such that for all k > K, the k-th n-Ramanujan prime is greater than half of the (k+1)-th n-Ramanujan prime? (Equivalently, is there a largest n-Ramanujan prime that is less than half of the next n-Ramanujan prime?) It is true for n = 0 by Bertrand's Postulate (see A062234), and for n = 1 by a theorem of Paksoy. Is it even true that if n is fixed, then (k-th n-Ramanujan prime) ~ ((k+1)-th n-Ramanujan prime) as k -> infinity? - _Jonathan Sondow_, Dec 16 2013

%H Murat Baris Paksoy, <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.6991">Derived Ramanujan primes: R'_n</a>, arXiv:1210.6991 [math.NT], 2012.

%e By Bertrand's Postulate (proved by Chebyshev), prime(k+1) < 2*prime(k) for all k, so a(0) = 0.

%e Ramanujan proved that the Ramanujan primes begin 2, 11, ..., so a(1) = 2.

%e Paksoy proved that the 2-Ramanujan primes begin 11, 41,..., so a(2) = 11.

%e It appears that the 3-Ramanujan primes begin 41, 149, ...; if true, then a(3) = 41.

%e It appears that the 4-Ramanujan primes begin 569, 571, 587, 1367 ...; if true, then a(4) = 587.

%Y Cf. A000040 (0-Ramanujan primes), A104272 (1-Ramanujan primes), A192820 (2-Ramanujan primes), A192821 (3-Ramanujan primes), A192822 (4-Ramanujan primes), A192823 (5-Ramanujan primes), A192824 (least n-Ramanujan prime). Cf. also A233822 = 2*R(n) - R(n+1) and A062234.

%K nonn,more

%O 0,2

%A _Jonathan Sondow_, Jun 08 2013

Lookup | Welcome | Wiki | Register | Music | Plot 2 | Demos | Index | Browse | More | WebCam
Contribute new seq. or comment | Format | Style Sheet | Transforms | Superseeker | Recents
The OEIS Community | Maintained by The OEIS Foundation Inc.

License Agreements, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy. .

Last modified April 24 18:17 EDT 2024. Contains 371962 sequences. (Running on oeis4.)