login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Minimum sum of absolute values of coefficients of a product of n binomials.
0

%I #5 Oct 12 2017 03:17:41

%S 6,8,10,12,16,16,20,24,28

%N Minimum sum of absolute values of coefficients of a product of n binomials.

%C Consider polynomials of the form P(a_1, ..., a_n) = (1-x^{a_1})*...*(1-x^{a_n}), where a_i are positive integers. Let L(a_1, ..., a_n) be the sum of absolute values of the coefficients. Then a(n) = min { L(a_1, ..., a_n) : 1 <= a_1 <= ..., <= a_n }.

%C Upper bounds (probably not tight, except perhaps for a(12)) for the following terms are: 36, 44, 52, 52, 60, 68, 84, 96, 116, 130, 140, 156, 192, 188, 228, 262, 280, 316, 368, 344, 416, 440, 460, 456, 492, 584, 652, 688, 684, 734, 872, 902, 976, 988, 1136, 1176, 1224, 1328, 1448, 1632, 1544, 1596, 1712, 1728, 1840.

%H P. Borwein and C. Ingalls, <a href="http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/~pborwein/PAPERS/P98.pdf">The Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem revisited</a>, L'Enseign. Math., 40 (1994), pp. 3-27.

%H M. Cipu, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1112/S1461157000001030">Upper bounds for norms of products of binomials</a>, LMS J. Comput. Math., 7 (2004), pp. 37-49.

%H R. Maltby, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-97-00865-X">Pure product polynomials and the Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem</a>, Math. Comp., 66 (1966), pp. 1323-1340.

%K nonn,more

%O 3,1

%A Mihai Cipu (mihai.cipu(AT)imar.ro), Mar 30 2004