Sofia January 31 2020 On the question "Which Highly composite numbers (A002182) are Zumkeller numbers (A083207)?" Ivan N. Ianakiev Abstract We prove that, for every integer n > 7, the highly composite number A002182(n) is a Zumkeller number. Lemma 1: If z is a Zumkeller number, then 2z is also a Zumkeller number. Proof: Let D_1 and D_2 be the sets of positive divisors of z and 2z, written in increasing order as follows: 1 = d_1 < d_2 < … < d_m. If d_i+1 <= 2d_i for 1 <= i < m, then according to Proposition 17 [1] z is a Zumkeller number. Let z be a Zumkeller number. Since D_2 has the same elements as D_1 plus doubles of some of the elements of D_1, then: 1) the sum of the elements of D_2 is also even, and 2) no elements greater than the elements of D_1 times two are introduced into D_1, in order to obtain D_2. Therefore, 2z is also a Zumkeller number. Fact 1: A002182(8) = 48 and A002182(9) = 60 are Zumkeller numbers, which can be easily checked. Fact 2 Let p_1^e_1 * p_2^e_2 * … * p_m^e_m be the prime factorization of A002182(n). Then, according to the finding of M. F. Hasler [3], for n > 8, A002182(n) is divisible by 60. Therefore, in its prime factorization p_1 = 2, which also applies to A002182(8) (see Fact 1). Fact 3 For n > 7, in the prime factorization of A002182(n) e_m = 1. If it were not so, we could build a smaller highly composite number with the same number of divisors, in whose primary factorization e_m = 1. Theorem: For every integer n > 7, A002182(n) is a Zumkeller number. Proof: For n > 7, p_m is such that floor(log_2(p_m)) <= e_1 (see Fact 2 above). If it were not so, then we could build a smaller highly composite number with the same number of divisors whose prime factorization would not include p_m, but would include a smaller prime/s to a greater power/s (see Fact 3 above). Therefore, there exists a power of p_1 e, such that e <= e_1 and p_1^e * p_m^e_m is, according to the finding of T. D. Noe [2], a Primitive Zumkeller number. Then, according to Lemma 1 (above) p_1^e_1 * p_m^e_m is a Zumkeller number. Therefore, according to Corollary 5 [1], for n > 7, we prove that a(n) = p_1^e_1 * p_m^e_m * s, where s is relatively prime to p_1 * p_m, is a Zumkeller number. References [1] Yuejian Peng, K.P.S. Bhaskara Rao, On Zumkeller numbers, Journal of Number Theory, Volume 133, Issue 4, April 2013, pp. 1135-1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2012.09.020 [2] Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence A180332". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. OEIS Foundation. https://oeis.org/A180332 [3] Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence A002182". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. OEIS Foundation. https://oeis.org/A002182