User talk:Alonso del Arte/Is this sequence interesting

I'm glad to see this page -- I've been thinking about writing something like this for a while now. My version would be very different, though: I don't see many problems with sequences like the three you mention in "Of non-general interest", for example. My antipathy is mostly reserved for linear recurrences which have nothing but trivial prioperties listed and arbitrary transformations of existing sequences, with no connection between the transform and the sequence.

Charles R Greathouse IV 07:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

You did write something similar in a SeqFan posting last year, which I thought of consulting prior to writing this. But after months of it just sitting in my brain, I decided I would just set it down in a hurry and later I can add other things as I am reminded of them. Thanks by the way for reminding me of boring linear recurrences and arbitrary transforms. Alonso del Arte 16:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Attack of the clone

I've added User:Charles R Greathouse IV/Is this sequence interesting, q.v. Please leave any comments on its Talk page.

Charles R Greathouse IV 20:11, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

A334321

Charles suggests A334321 should be under "not interesting but maybe should be in the OEIS." - Alonso del Arte (talk) 01:28, 24 April 2020 (EDT)