|
1, 1, 2, 0, 5, -3, 4, 2, 6, -12, 12, -54, 19, 7, 26, -72, 47, -309, 94, 32, 126, -372, 222, -1584, 469, 157, 626, -1872, 1097, -7959, 6, 4, 10, -12, 22, -60, 22, -4, 18, -156, 6, -612, 102, -44, 58, -876, -74, -3372, 502, -244, 258, -4476, -474, -17172, 2502, -1244, 1258, -22476, -2474, -86172, 41, 25, 66, -96, 141, -459, 148, -46, 102
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
0,3
|
|
COMMENTS
|
Interestingly, this kind of sampling of deficiency (A033879; recall that the range of A276086 does not cover the whole N) biases it strongly towards negative values: of the first 2310 terms, 1565 are negative (~ 68%) and of the first 30030 terms, 22507 are negative (~ 75%). Compare also to A323174, which covers whole N.
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
FORMULA
|
|
|
PROG
|
(PARI)
A276086(n) = { my(i=0, m=1, pr=1, nextpr); while((n>0), i=i+1; nextpr = prime(i)*pr; if((n%nextpr), m*=(prime(i)^((n%nextpr)/pr)); n-=(n%nextpr)); pr=nextpr); m; };
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
sign
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|