login
A243842
Pair deficit of the most equal partition of n into two parts using standard rounding of the expectations of n, floor(n/2) and n-floor(n/2), assuming equal likelihood of states defined by the number of 2-cycles.
0
0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1
OFFSET
0,25
COMMENTS
The expectation for n = 2 is 0.5 so this is the first and only integer n for which the convention of rounding a half to an even number is pertinent. This affects a(2), a(3), a(4), and a(5). For n>2, twice the expectation, 2*E(n) must be an odd integer for this situation to arise. 2*E(n) = n*(n-1)*I(n-2)/I(n) for n>=2, where I(n) = A000085(n).
First notice that gcd(I(n), I(n-2)) = gcd(I(n-1) + (n-1)*I(n-2), I(n-2)) = gcd(I(n-1), I(n-2)). Now, suppose that there is an odd prime factor s that divides both I(m-1) and I(m-2) for some m. This would then imply that I(m), I(m+1), I(m+2), ... would all be a multiple of s, i.e., I(n) mod s would be zero for all n greater than or equal to m. A result of Chowla implies that I(n) mod s equals 1 infinitely often for any fixed odd prime s. This is a contradiction of the initial supposition. In other words, there is no odd prime factor that divides both I(m-1) and I(m-2), hence no odd prime factor in common between I(m) and I(m-2).
We can rewrite 2*E(n) as n*(n-1)*(2^a)*p/((2^b)*q), where gcd(p,q) = 1 and both p and q are odd. Using the result from Kim regarding b as a function of n, it can be shown that q > 2^(n/2) > n*(n-1) for all n greater than or equal to 16. Since q is larger than n*(n-1) we can reduce n*(n-1)/q to r/q', where gcd(r,q') = 1, q' odd, and q' is greater than 1. Let Z be an odd prime factor of q'. Z is not a divisor of r, p, or 2^a. Since Z is prime this implies that Z is not a divisor of the product r*2^a*p. Now rewrite 2*E(n) = r*(2^a)*p/(q'*(2^b)) as 2*E(n) = r*(2^a)*p/(Z*q"*(2^b)), where Z is an odd prime such that q' = Z*q". Let us suppose that 2*E(n) is an integer then 2*E(n)*Z*q"*(2^b) = r*(2^a)*p. This implies that Z is a divisor of r*(2^a)*p. This is a contradiction. We conclude that 2*E(n) is not an integer for n greater than or equal to 16. The remaining cases for 2*E(n) between 2 and 16 can be verified numerically.
Interestingly, given the recurrence relation I(n) = I(n-1) + (n-1)*I(n-2), 2*E(n) = n - n*I(n-1)/I(n). Defining J(n) as I(n)/I(n-1), this yields 2*E(n) = n - n/J(n) where J(n) = 1+(n-1)/J(n-1). n/J(n) happens to be the finite continued fraction n/1+ (n-1)/1+ ...3/1+ 2/(1+1).
REFERENCES
Oskar Perron, Die Lehre von den Kettenbrüchen Band I, II, B. G. Teubner, 1954.
LINKS
S. Chowla, I. N. Hernstein, and W. K. Moore, On recursions connected with symmetric groups. I, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 3 (1951), 328-334.
Dongsu Kim, and J.S. Kim, A combinatorial approach to the power of 2 in the number of involutions, arXiv:0902.4311 [math.CO], 2009-2010.
Dongsu Kim, and J.S. Kim, A combinatorial approach to the power of 2 in the number of involutions, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 117 (8) (2010): 1082-1094
FORMULA
Let Er(n) = round(A162970(n)/A000085(n)). Then a(n) = Er(n) - Er(floor(n/2)) - Er(n-floor(n/2)).
EXAMPLE
Trivially, for n = 0,1 no pairs are possible so a(0) and a(1) are 0.
For n = 2, the expectation, E(n), equals 0.5. So a(2) = round(E(2)) - round(E(1)) - round(E(1)) = 0.
For n = 5 = 2 + 3, E(5) = 20/13, E(2) = 0.5 and E(3) = 0.75 and a(5) = round(E(5)) - round(E(2)) - round(E(3)) = 1.
CROSSREFS
Cf. A162970 (numerator for calculating the expected value).
Cf. A000085 (denominator for calculating the expected value).
Cf. A243840 (analogous using floor rounding).
Cf. A243841 (analogous using ceiling rounding).
Sequence in context: A337683 A362451 A092673 * A367405 A112400 A316523
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Rajan Murthy and Vale Murthy, Jun 12 2014
STATUS
approved